» Articles » PMID: 11504922

TOUCHSTONE: an Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction Method That Uses Threading-based Tertiary Restraints

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2001 Aug 16
PMID 11504922
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The successful prediction of protein structure from amino acid sequence requires two features: an efficient conformational search algorithm and an energy function with a global minimum in the native state. As a step toward addressing both issues, a threading-based method of secondary and tertiary restraint prediction has been developed and applied to ab initio folding. Such restraints are derived by extracting consensus contacts and local secondary structure from at least weakly scoring structures that, in some cases, can lack any global similarity to the sequence of interest. Furthermore, to generate representative protein structures, a reduced lattice-based protein model is used with replica exchange Monte Carlo to explore conformational space. We report results on the application of this methodology, termed TOUCHSTONE, to 65 proteins whose lengths range from 39 to 146 residues. For 47 (40) proteins, a cluster centroid whose rms deviation from native is below 6.5 (5) A is found in one of the five lowest energy centroids. The number of correctly predicted proteins increases to 50 when atomic detail is added and a knowledge-based atomic potential is combined with clustered and nonclustered structures for candidate selection. The combination of the ratio of the relative number of contacts to the protein length and the number of clusters generated by the folding algorithm is a reliable indicator of the likelihood of successful fold prediction, thereby opening the way for genome-scale ab initio folding.

Citing Articles

NuFold: end-to-end approach for RNA tertiary structure prediction with flexible nucleobase center representation.

Kagaya Y, Zhang Z, Ibtehaz N, Wang X, Nakamura T, Punuru P Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):881.

PMID: 39837861 PMC: 11751094. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56261-7.


AlphaFold2, SPINE-X, and Seder on Four Hard CASP Targets.

Faraggi E, Jernigan R, Kloczkowski A Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2867:141-152.

PMID: 39576579 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4196-5_8.


Protein Structure Refinement Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization with Decomposition Strategy.

Zhou C, Wang D, Pan X, Shen H Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(9).

PMID: 33922489 PMC: 8122964. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094408.


An information gain-based approach for evaluating protein structure models.

Postic G, Janel N, Tuffery P, Moroy G Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020; 18:2228-2236.

PMID: 32837711 PMC: 7431362. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.013.


Artificial intelligence-based multi-objective optimization protocol for protein structure refinement.

Wang D, Geng L, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y Bioinformatics. 2019; 36(2):437-448.

PMID: 31274151 PMC: 7999140. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz544.


References
1.
Pillardy J, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, Lee J, Ripoll D, Kazmierkiewicz R . Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(5):2329-33. PMC: 30138. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.041609598. View

2.
Bukhman Y, Skolnick J . BioMolQuest: integrated database-based retrieval of protein structural and functional information. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17(5):468-78. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.5.468. View

3.
Park B, Levitt M . Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol. 1996; 258(2):367-92. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0256. View

4.
Panchenko A, BRYANT S . Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition. J Mol Biol. 2000; 296(5):1319-31. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3541. View

5.
Sanchez R, Sali A . Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins. 1997; Suppl 1:50-8. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1997)1+<50::aid-prot8>3.3.co;2-w. View