When is Now? Perception of Simultaneity
Overview
Affiliations
We address the following question: Is there a difference (D) between the amount of time for auditory and visual stimuli to be perceived? On each of 1000 trials, observers were presented with a light-sound pair, separated by a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between -250 ms (sound first) and +250 ms. Observers indicated if the light-sound pair came on simultaneously by pressing one of two (yes or no) keys. The SOA most likely to yield affirmative responses was defined as the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS). PSS values were between -21 ms (i.e. sound 21 ms before light) and +150 ms. Evidence is presented that each PSS is observer specific. In a second experiment, each observer was tested using two observer-stimulus distances. The resultant PSS values are highly correlated (r = 0.954, p = 0.003), suggesting that each observer's PSS is stable. PSS values were significantly affected by observer-stimulus distance, suggesting that observers do not take account of changes in distance on the resultant difference in arrival times of light and sound. The difference RTd in simple reaction time to single visual and auditory stimuli was also estimated; no evidence that RTd is observer specific or stable was found. The implications of these findings for the perception of multisensory stimuli are discussed.
Past and present experience shifts audiovisual temporal perception in rats.
Al-Youzbaki M, Schormans A, Allman B Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1287587.
PMID: 37908200 PMC: 10613659. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1287587.
When 2 become 1: Autistic simultaneity judgements about asynchronous audiovisual speech.
Poole D, Gowen E, Poliakoff E, Lambrechts A, Jones L Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(9):1865-1882.
PMID: 37593957 PMC: 11373161. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231197518.
Zhao S, Wang C, Feng C, Wang Y, Feng W Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 43(8):2478-2494.
PMID: 35122347 PMC: 9057096. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25797.
Effect of timing delay between visual and vestibular stimuli on heading perception.
Rodriguez R, Crane B J Neurophysiol. 2021; 126(1):304-312.
PMID: 34191637 PMC: 8325599. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00351.2020.
Farrugia N, Lamouroux A, Rocher C, Bouvet J, Lioi G Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:626723.
PMID: 34177443 PMC: 8222590. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.626723.