» Articles » PMID: 28902903

Visuo-perceptual Capabilities Predict Sensitivity for Coinciding Auditory and Visual Transients in Multi-element Displays

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Sep 14
PMID 28902903
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to obtain a coherent representation of the outside world, auditory and visual information are integrated during human information processing. There is remarkable variance among observers in the capability to integrate auditory and visual information. Here, we propose that visuo-perceptual capabilities predict detection performance for audiovisually coinciding transients in multi-element displays due to severe capacity limitations in audiovisual integration. In the reported experiment, we employed an individual differences approach in order to investigate this hypothesis. Therefore, we measured performance in a useful-field-of-view task that captures detection performance for briefly presented stimuli across a large perceptual field. Furthermore, we measured sensitivity for visual direction changes that coincide with tones within the same participants. Our results show that individual differences in visuo-perceptual capabilities predicted sensitivity for the presence of audiovisually synchronous events among competing visual stimuli. To ensure that this correlation does not stem from superordinate factors, we also tested performance in an unrelated working memory task. Performance in this task was independent of sensitivity for the presence of audiovisually synchronous events. Our findings strengthen the proposed link between visuo-perceptual capabilities and audiovisual integration. The results also suggest that basic visuo-perceptual capabilities provide the basis for the subsequent integration of auditory and visual information.

Citing Articles

From metacognitive beliefs to strategy selection: does fake performance feedback influence cognitive offloading?.

Grinschgl S, Meyerhoff H, Schwan S, Papenmeier F Psychol Res. 2020; 85(7):2654-2666.

PMID: 33104868 PMC: 8440305. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01435-9.


Individual differences in multiple object tracking, attentional cueing, and age account for variability in the capacity of audiovisual integration.

Wilbiks J, Beatteay A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 82(7):3521-3543.

PMID: 32529573 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02062-7.

References
1.
Stevenson R, Zemtsov R, Wallace M . Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(6):1517-29. PMC: 3795069. DOI: 10.1037/a0027339. View

2.
Ernst M, Bulthoff H . Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(4):162-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002. View

3.
Belopolsky A, Zwaan L, Theeuwes J, Kramer A . The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14(5):934-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194124. View

4.
Olivers C, Awh E, Van der Burg E . The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016; 42(12):2115-2124. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000268. View

5.
Spence C . Crossmodal spatial attention. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1191:182-200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05440.x. View