Brett K Hayes
Overview
Explore the profile of Brett K Hayes including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
57
Citations
215
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Lee W, Li A, Lee J, Hayes B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2024 Oct;
50(9):1345-1360.
PMID: 39418450
Learning traps arise when early experience leads to a false belief about the reward structure of the environment which, in turn, leads to avoidance of rewarding options. Previous work on...
2.
Hayes B, Pham J, Lee J, Perfors A, Ransom K, Desai S
Cognition
. 2024 Jan;
245:105717.
PMID: 38241825
When people use samples of evidence to make inferences, they consider both the sample contents and how the sample was generated ("sampling assumptions"). The current studies examined whether people can...
3.
Hayes B, Stephens R, Dunn J
Behav Brain Sci
. 2023 Jul;
46:e126.
PMID: 37462180
De Neys offers a welcome departure from the dual-process accounts that have dominated theorizing about reasoning. However, we see little justification for retaining the distinction between intuition and deliberation. Instead,...
4.
Ransom K, Perfors A, Hayes B, Desai S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2022 Sep;
49(9):1419-1438.
PMID: 36048051
In describing how people generalize from observed samples of data to novel cases, theories of inductive inference have emphasized the learner's reliance on the contents of the sample. More recently,...
5.
Hayes B, Liew S, Desai S, Navarro D, Wen Y
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2022 Aug;
49(2):284-300.
PMID: 36006725
The samples of evidence we use to make inferences in everyday and formal settings are often subject to selection biases. Two property induction experiments examined group and individual sensitivity to...
6.
Meyer-Grant C, Cruz N, Singmann H, Winiger S, Goswami S, Hayes B, et al.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2022 Aug;
49(8):1280-1305.
PMID: 36006720
An ongoing debate in the literature on human reasoning concerns whether or not the logical status (valid vs. invalid) of an argument can be intuitively detected. The finding that conclusions...
7.
Ng D, Lee J, Hayes B, Lovibond P
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn
. 2022 Jul;
48(3):179-189.
PMID: 35878080
A challenge for generalization models is to specify how excitation generated from a CS+ (i.e., positive evidence) should interact with inhibition from a CS- (i.e., negative evidence) to produce generalized...
8.
Desai S, Xie B, Hayes B
Cognition
. 2022 Feb;
223:105023.
PMID: 35149359
Consensus between informants is a valuable cue to a claim's epistemic value, when informants' beliefs are developed independently of each other. Recent work (Yousif et al., 2019) described an illusion...
9.
Hayes B, Stephens R, Lee M, Dunn J, Kaluve A, Choi-Christou J, et al.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2022 Jan;
48(11):1598-1617.
PMID: 35084930
Much recent research and theorizing in the field of reasoning has been concerned with intuitive sensitivity to logical validity, such as the logic-brightness effect, in which logically valid arguments are...
10.
Croft J, Grisham J, Perfors A, Hayes B
J Psychopathol Behav Assess
. 2021 Nov;
44(2):364-375.
PMID: 34840417
An experiment examined decision-making processes among nonclinical participants with low or high levels of OCD symptomatology (N = 303). To better simulate the decision environments that are most likely to...