Brett K Hayes
Overview
Explore the profile of Brett K Hayes including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
57
Citations
215
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
11.
Hayes B, Wisken A, Cruz N
J Exp Psychol Gen
. 2021 Mar;
150(10):2185-2191.
PMID: 33734776
When people choose products based on online reviews, they show a "popularity bias," overweighting review sample size relative to rated quality. We propose a novel account of this effect based...
12.
Xie B, Navarro D, Hayes B
Cogn Sci
. 2020 Sep;
44(9):e12895.
PMID: 32939797
The extent to which we generalize a novel property from a sample of familiar instances to novel instances depends on the sample composition. Previous property induction experiments have only used...
13.
Lee J, Mills L, Hayes B, Livesey E
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
. 2020 Jul;
74(1):106-121.
PMID: 32713327
Studying generalisation of associative learning requires analysis of response gradients measured over a continuous stimulus dimension. In human studies, there is often a high degree of individual variation in the...
14.
Stephens R, Dunn J, Hayes B, Kalish M
Cognition
. 2020 Feb;
199:104223.
PMID: 32092549
Dual-process theories posit that separate kinds of intuitive (Type 1) and reflective (Type 2) processes contribute to reasoning. Under this view, inductive judgments are more heavily influenced by Type 1...
15.
Lovibond P, Lee J, Hayes B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2019 Oct;
46(6):1106-1120.
PMID: 31580122
Generalization of learning can arise from 2 distinct sources: failure to discriminate a novel test stimulus from the trained stimulus and active extrapolation from the trained stimulus to the test...
16.
Hayes B, Wei P, Dunn J, Stephens R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2019 Jul;
46(4):699-719.
PMID: 31343253
Four experiments examined the claims that people can intuitively assess the logical validity of arguments, and that qualitatively different reasoning processes drive intuitive and explicit validity assessments. In each study...
17.
Hayes B, Banner S, Forrester S, Navarro D
Cogn Psychol
. 2019 Jun;
113:101221.
PMID: 31200210
We propose and test a Bayesian model of property induction with evidence that has been selectively sampled leading to "censoring" or exclusion of potentially relevant data. A core model prediction...
18.
Lee J, Lovibond P, Hayes B
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
. 2019 May;
72(11):2647-2657.
PMID: 31144583
In property induction tasks, encountering a diverse range of instances (e.g., hippos and hamsters) with a given property usually increases our willingness to generalise that property to a novel instance,...
19.
Hayes B, Navarro D, Stephens R, Ransom K, Dilevski N
Psychon Bull Rev
. 2019 Jan;
26(3):1043-1050.
PMID: 30684248
A key phenomenon in inductive reasoning is the diversity effect, whereby a novel property is more likely to be generalized when it is shared by an evidence sample composed of...
20.
Lee J, Lovibond P, Hayes B, Navarro D
J Exp Psychol Gen
. 2018 Nov;
148(2):289-303.
PMID: 30475021
When generalizing properties from known to novel instances, both positive evidence (instances known to possess a property) and negative evidence (instances known not to possess a property) must be integrated....