» Articles » PMID: 22388772

Sexual Size Dimorphism, Canine Dimorphism, and Male-male Competition in Primates: Where Do Humans Fit In?

Overview
Journal Hum Nat
Date 2012 Mar 6
PMID 22388772
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism is generally associated with sexual selection via agonistic male competition in nonhuman primates. These primate models play an important role in understanding the origins and evolution of human behavior. Human size dimorphism is often hypothesized to be associated with high rates of male violence and polygyny. This raises the question of whether human dimorphism and patterns of male violence are inherited from a common ancestor with chimpanzees or are uniquely derived. Here I review patterns of, and causal models for, dimorphism in humans and other primates. While dimorphism in primates is associated with agonistic male mate competition, a variety of factors can affect male and female size, and thereby dimorphism. The causes of human sexual size dimorphism are uncertain, and could involve several non-mutually-exclusive mechanisms, such as mate competition, resource competition, intergroup violence, and female choice. A phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of dimorphism, including fossil hominins, indicates that the modern human condition is derived. This suggests that at least some behavioral similarities with Pan associated with dimorphism may have arisen independently, and not directly from a common ancestor.

Citing Articles

Genetic and metabolic insights into sexual dimorphism in the flexor carpi radialis of Asiatic toads (Bufo gargarizans) associated with amplexus behavior.

Ma H, Jin L, Zhao L, Yan C, Mi Z BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):192.

PMID: 39994541 PMC: 11853992. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11392-5.


How (and why) languages became more complex as we evolved more prosocial: the human self-domestication view.

Benitez-Burraco A Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1499994.

PMID: 39895972 PMC: 11782162. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1499994.


Comparative Context of Hard-Tissue Sexual Dimorphism in Early Hominins: Implications for Alpha Taxonomy.

Balolia K, Wood B Evol Anthropol. 2025; 34(1):e22052.

PMID: 39748147 PMC: 11695701. DOI: 10.1002/evan.22052.


Comparative neuroimaging of sex differences in human and mouse brain anatomy.

Guma E, Beauchamp A, Liu S, Levitis E, Ellegood J, Pham L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38488854 PMC: 10942785. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.92200.


American crows that excel at tool use activate neural circuits distinct from less talented individuals.

Pendergraft L, Marzluff J, Cross D, Shimizu T, Templeton C Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6539.

PMID: 37863938 PMC: 10589215. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42203-8.


References
1.
White T, Asfaw B, Beyene Y, Haile-Selassie Y, Lovejoy C, Suwa G . Ardipithecus ramidus and the paleobiology of early hominids. Science. 2009; 326(5949):75-86. View

2.
Robson S, Wood B . Hominin life history: reconstruction and evolution. J Anat. 2008; 212(4):394-425. PMC: 2409099. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00867.x. View

3.
Rogers A, Mukherjee A . QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN HUMAN BODY SIZE. Evolution. 2017; 46(1):226-234. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01997.x. View

4.
Lovejoy C . The origin of man. Science. 1981; 211(4480):341-50. DOI: 10.1126/science.211.4480.341. View

5.
Plavcan J, Ward C, Paulus F . Estimating canine tooth crown height in early Australopithecus. J Hum Evol. 2009; 57(1):2-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.005. View