» Articles » PMID: 9744499

Estimations of Intra- and Extracellular Volume and PH by 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Effect of Therapy on RIF-1 Tumours

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 1998 Sep 23
PMID 9744499
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quantification of metabolite or drug concentrations in living tissues requires determination of intra- and extracellular volumes. This study demonstrates how this can be achieved non-invasively by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) employing dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) as a marker of total water space, 3-aminopropylphosphonate (3-APP) as a marker of extracellular space and P and 3-APP as markers of intracellular pH (pH) and extracellular pH (pHe) respectively. The MRS measurements of the tumour volumes were validated by classic radiolabelling methods using 3H2O and [14C]inulin as markers of total and extracellular space respectively. The extracellular volume fraction measured by radiolabelling of RIF-1 tumours was 23 +/- 0.83% (mean +/- s.e.m. n = 9), not significantly different (P > 0.1) from that found by MRS (27 +/- 2.9%, n = 9, London, and 35 +/- 6.7, n = 14, Baltimore). In untreated RIF-1 tumours, pH was about 0.2 units higher than pHe (P < 0.01). 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment (165 mg kg(-1)) caused no significant changes in either pHe or per cent extracellular volume. However significant increases in pH, 48 h after treatment (P < 0.01) correlated with decreased tumour size and improved bioenergetic status [NTP/inorganic phosphate (Pi) ratio]. This study shows the feasibility of an MR method (verified by a 'gold standard') for studying the effects of drug treatment on intra- and extracellular spaces and pH in solid tumours in vivo.

Citing Articles

Multinuclear MRI in Drug Discovery.

Bartusik-Aebisher D, Bober Z, Zalejska-Fiolka J, Kawczyk-Krupka A, Aebisher D Molecules. 2022; 27(19).

PMID: 36235031 PMC: 9572840. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196493.


Accumulation of 3-aminopropylphosphonate in the ex vivo brain observed by phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance.

Shaul D, Grieb B, Lev-Cohain N, Sosna J, Gomori J, Katz-Brull R NMR Biomed. 2022; 35(8):e4721.

PMID: 35229366 PMC: 9540894. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4721.


Renal pH Mapping Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI: Experimental Protocol.

Pavuluri K, Consolino L, Longo D, Irrera P, Sun P, McMahon M Methods Mol Biol. 2021; 2216:455-471.

PMID: 33476017 PMC: 9703269. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0978-1_27.


Tumor Microenvironment Biosensors for Hyperpolarized Carbon-13 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Mu C, Korenchan D, Wang S, Wilson D, Flavell R Mol Imaging Biol. 2021; 23(3):323-334.

PMID: 33415679 PMC: 8105261. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01570-0.


How and Why Are Cancers Acidic? Carbonic Anhydrase IX and the Homeostatic Control of Tumour Extracellular pH.

Lee S, Griffiths J Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(6).

PMID: 32570870 PMC: 7352839. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061616.


References
1.
Gillies R, Ogino T, Shulman R, Ward D . 31P nuclear magnetic resonance evidence for the regulation of intracellular pH by Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. J Cell Biol. 1982; 95(1):24-8. PMC: 2112363. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.24. View

2.
Hofer K, Mivechi N . Tumor cell sensitivity to hyperthermia as a function of extracellular and intracellular pH. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980; 65(3):621-5. View

3.
Tozer G, Bhujwalla Z, Griffiths J, Maxwell R . Phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and blood perfusion of the RIF-1 tumor following X-irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989; 16(1):155-64. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90023-0. View

4.
Bhujwalla Z, Constantinidis I, Chatham J, Wehrle J, Glickson J . Energy metabolism, pH changes, and lactate production in RIF-1 tumors following intratumoral injection of glucose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992; 22(1):95-101. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90987-s. View

5.
Li S, Wehrle J, Glickson J, Kumar N, BRAUNSCHWEIGER P . Tumor bioenergetics and blood flow in RIF-1 murine tumors treated with 5-fluorouracil. Magn Reson Med. 1991; 22(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910220106. View