» Articles » PMID: 9655710

Noninvasive Monitoring of Cardiac Output in Critically Ill Patients Using Transesophageal Doppler

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 1998 Jul 9
PMID 9655710
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Measurement of cardiac output using thermodilution technique in mechanically ventilated patients is associated with significant morbidity. The goal of the present study was to assess the validity of cardiac output measurement using transesophageal Doppler in critically ill patients. Forty-six patients from three different intensive care units underwent 136 paired cardiac output measurements using thermodilution (COTH) and transesophageal Doppler (COTED). In addition, simultaneous suprasternal Doppler and indirect calorimetry (Fick principle) were used to measure cardiac output in 26 patients from one center. A good correlation was found between COTH and COTED (r = 0.95), with a small systematic underestimation (bias = 0.24 L/min) using transesophageal Doppler. The limits of agreement between COTH and COTED were +2 L/min and -1.5 L/min. Variations in cardiac output between two consecutive measures using either transesophageal Doppler or thermodilution techniques were similar in direction and magnitude (bias = 0 L/min; limits of agreement = +/-1.7 L/min). Suprasternal Doppler and indirect calorimetry yielded similar correlations and agreements in the subset of patients in whom they were used. These results confirm that transesophageal Doppler can provide a noninvasive, clinically useful estimate of cardiac output and detect hemodynamic changes in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.

Citing Articles

Ability of Carotid Corrected Flow Time to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Mechanically Ventilated Using Low Tidal Volume after Surgery.

Jung S, Kim J, Na S, Nam W, Kim D J Clin Med. 2021; 10(12).

PMID: 34204523 PMC: 8234831. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122676.


Basic critical care echocardiography training of intensivists allows reproducible and reliable measurements of cardiac output.

Villavicencio C, Leache J, Marin J, Oliva I, Rodriguez A, Bodi M Ultrasound J. 2019; 11(1):5.

PMID: 31359188 PMC: 6638616. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-019-0120-0.


Cardiac output monitoring: Technology and choice.

Kobe J, Mishra N, Arya V, Al-Moustadi W, Nates W, Kumar B Ann Card Anaesth. 2019; 22(1):6-17.

PMID: 30648673 PMC: 6350438. DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_41_18.


Identification of volume parameters monitored with a noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart disease surgery.

Cheng Y, Xu F, Li J Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(39):e12289.

PMID: 30278500 PMC: 6181535. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012289.


Pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position.

Kim D, Shin S, Kim J, Kim S, Jo M, Choi Y Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018; 14:1175-1183.

PMID: 30013353 PMC: 6038863. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S170395.