» Articles » PMID: 27590048

The Assessment of Circulating Volume Using Inferior Vena Cava Collapse Index and Carotid Doppler Velocity Time Integral in Healthy Volunteers: a Pilot Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2016 Sep 4
PMID 27590048
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Assessment of circulating volume and the requirement for fluid replacement are fundamental to resuscitation but remain largely empirical. Passive leg raise (PLR) may determine fluid responders while avoiding potential fluid overload. We hypothesised that inferior vena cava collapse index (IVCCI) and carotid artery blood flow would change predictably in response to PLR, potentially providing a non-invasive tool to assess circulating volume and identifying fluid responsive patients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective proof of concept pilot study on fasted healthy volunteers. One operator measured IVC diameter during quiet respiration and sniff, and carotid artery flow. Stroke volume (SV) was also measured using suprasternal Doppler. Our primary endpoint was change in IVCCI after PLR. We also studied changes in IVCCI after "sniff", and correlation between carotid artery flow and SV.

Results: Passive leg raise was associated with significant reduction in the mean inferior vena cava collapsibility index from 0.24 to 0.17 (p < 0.01). Mean stroke volume increased from 56.0 to 69.2 mL (p < 0.01). There was no significant change in common carotid artery blood flow. Changes in physiology consequent upon passive leg raise normalised rapidly.

Discussion: Passive leg raise is associated with a decrease of IVCCI and increase in stroke volume. However, the wide range of values observed suggests that factors other than circulating volume predominate in determining the proportion of collapse with respiration.

Conclusion: In contrast to other studies, we did not find that carotid blood flow increased with passive leg raise. Rapid normalisation of post-PLR physiology may account for this.

Citing Articles

Predictive value of trendelenburg position and carotid ultrasound for fluid responsiveness in patients on VV-ECMO with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position.

Zhao J, Sun Y, Tang J, Guo K, Zhuge J, Fang H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31808.

PMID: 39738306 PMC: 11685402. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83038-7.


Comparison of subclavian vein and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in the intensive care unit.

Solak S, Erkoc S, Bermede O, Bayar M Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024; 70(12):e20240786.

PMID: 39630720 PMC: 11639514. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240786.


Predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing parturients undergoing caesarean section via carotid artery blood flow and velocity time integral measured by carotid ultrasound: a prospective cohort study.

Dai S, Wang C, Tao X, Shen J, Xu L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):60.

PMID: 38216901 PMC: 10785346. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06246-z.


Pre-operative Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Internal Jugular Vein Collapsibility Index and Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index to Predict Post Spinal Hypotension in Pregnant Women Undergoing Caesarean Section.

Elbadry A, El Dabe A, Abu Sabaa M Anesth Pain Med. 2022; 12(1):e121648.

PMID: 35433379 PMC: 8995868. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.121648.


In training emergency physicians the carotid artery Doppler with passive leg raise, does previous sonographic experience influence scan time and competency?.

Osgood R, Mohan S, John L, Stirling E, Stirling S Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021; 24(1):20-26.

PMID: 34760607 PMC: 8412025. DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12204.


References
1.
Gassner M, Killu K, Bauman Z, Coba V, Rosso K, Blyden D . Feasibility of common carotid artery point of care ultrasound in cardiac output measurements compared to invasive methods. J Ultrasound. 2015; 18(2):127-33. PMC: 4504859. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-014-0139-9. View

2.
Schmid E, Spahn D, Tornic M . Reliability of a new generation transesophageal Doppler device for cardiac output monitoring. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77(5):971-9. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00017. View

3.
Chong S, Peyton P . A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Anaesthesia. 2012; 67(11):1266-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07311.x. View

4.
Lanspa M, Grissom C, Hirshberg E, Jones J, Brown S . Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock. Shock. 2013; 39(2):155-60. PMC: 3580843. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31827f1c6a. View

5.
Dabrowski G, Steinberg S, Ferrara J, Flint L . A critical assessment of endpoints of shock resuscitation. Surg Clin North Am. 2000; 80(3):825-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70098-0. View