» Articles » PMID: 9532750

Response Allocation to Concurrent Fixed-ratio Reinforcement Schedules with Work Requirements by Adults with Mental Retardation and Typical Preschool Children

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1998 Apr 9
PMID 9532750
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present experiments examined the effect of work requirements in combination with reinforcement schedule on the choice behavior of adults with mental retardation and preschool children. The work requirements of age-appropriate tasks (i.e., sorting silverware, jumping hurdles, tossing beanbags) were manipulated. Participants were presented with their choice of two response options for each trial that varied simultaneously on both work requirement and reinforcement schedule. Results showed that when responding to both choices occurred on the same reinforcement schedule, participants allocated most of their responses to the option with the easier work requirement. When the response option requiring less work was on a leaner reinforcement schedule, most participants shifted their choice to exert more work. There were individual differences across participants regarding their pattern of responding and when they switched from the lesser to the greater work requirement. Data showed that participants' responding was largely controlled by the reinforcement received for responding to each level of work. Various conceptualizations regarding the effects of work requirements on choice behavior are discussed.

Citing Articles

Action control costs in task selection: Agents avoid actions with incompatible movement and effect features.

Neszmelyi B, Pfister R Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(4):1330-1341.

PMID: 38514596 PMC: 11093875. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02863-0.


Development and function of consequence classes in operant behavior.

Cuvo A Behav Anal. 2012; 23(1):57-68.

PMID: 22478338 PMC: 2731378. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391999.


Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law.

Borrero C, Vollmer T, Borrero J, Bourret J, Sloman K, Samaha A J Exp Anal Behav. 2010; 93(3):455-69.

PMID: 21119856 PMC: 2861880. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-455.


Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand.

Kool W, McGuire J, Rosen Z, Botvinick M J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010; 139(4):665-82.

PMID: 20853993 PMC: 2970648. DOI: 10.1037/a0020198.


Sensitivity and bias under conditions of equal and unequal academic task difficulty.

Reed D, Martens B J Appl Behav Anal. 2008; 41(1):39-52.

PMID: 18468278 PMC: 2410195. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-39.


References
1.
Hunter I, Davison M . Independence of response force and reinforcement rate on concurrent variable-interval schedule performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982; 37(2):183-97. PMC: 1333133. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-183. View

2.
Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

3.
Azrin N . Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960; 3:123-42. PMC: 1403961. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-123. View

4.
Adair E, Wright B . Behavioral thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey when response effort is varied. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1976; 90(2):179-84. DOI: 10.1037/h0077197. View

5.
Pierce W, Epling W . The applied importance of research on the matching law. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995; 28(2):237-41. PMC: 1279818. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-237. View