» Articles » PMID: 2373655

A Collateral Effect of Reward Predicted by Matching Theory

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1990 Jan 1
PMID 2373655
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Matching theory describes a process by which organisms distribute their behavior between two or more concurrent schedules of reinforcement (Herrnstein, 1961). In an attempt to determine the generality of matching theory to applied settings, 2 students receiving special education were provided with academic response alternatives. Using a combined simultaneous treatments design and reversal design, unequal ratio schedules of reinforcement were varied across two academic responses. Findings indicated that both subjects allocated higher rates of responses to the richer schedule of reinforcement, although only one responded exclusively to the richer schedule. The present results lend support to a postulation that positive reinforcement may have undesirable collateral effects that are predicted by matching theory (Balsam & Bondy, 1983).

Citing Articles

Human sensitivity to reinforcement: A comment on Kollins, Newland, and Critchfield's (1997) quantitative literature review.

Derenne A, Baron A Behav Anal. 2012; 22(1):35-41.

PMID: 22478319 PMC: 2731321. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391976.


Trends in the measurement of social validity.

Kennedy C Behav Anal. 2012; 15(2):147-56.

PMID: 22478125 PMC: 2733484. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392597.


An investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction.

Athens E, Vollmer T J Appl Behav Anal. 2011; 43(4):569-89.

PMID: 21541145 PMC: 2998250. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-569.


Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter?.

Kollins S, Newland M, Critchfield T Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 4(2):208-20.

PMID: 21331827 DOI: 10.3758/BF03209395.


Sensitivity and bias under conditions of equal and unequal academic task difficulty.

Reed D, Martens B J Appl Behav Anal. 2008; 41(1):39-52.

PMID: 18468278 PMC: 2410195. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-39.


References
1.
Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

2.
Balsam P, Bondy A . The negative side effects of reward. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983; 16(3):283-96. PMC: 1307887. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-283. View

3.
Nevin J . Quantitative analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 42(3):421-34. PMC: 1348113. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-421. View

4.
Parrish J, Cataldo M, Kolko D, Neef N, Egel A . Experimental analysis of response covariation among compliant and inappropriate behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986; 19(3):241-54. PMC: 1308068. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-241. View

5.
Herrnstein R, Loveland D . Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975; 24(1):107-16. PMC: 1333386. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107. View