» Articles » PMID: 9184266

Vertebral and Metacarpal Morphometry As Indicators of Nutritional Improvement

Overview
Journal Clin Rheumatol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 1997 May 1
PMID 9184266
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because of the importance of nutrition in the development of bone mass, we studied the nutritional state, and bone state by means of metacarpal radiogrammetric measurements and vertebral morphometry in a group of 40 premenopausal women born between 1960 and 1970, mean age 29 +/- 5 years, and in another group of 40 postmenopausal women born between 1934 and 1944, mean age 55 +/- 4 years. Both groups were considered normal, the main characteristic distinguishing them being that the women born between 1934 and 1944 grew up in a period of widespread malnutrition in Spain and the women born between 1960 and 1970 grew up in a period of normal nutrition. Protein, carbohydrate and fat intake in these two periods differed significantly (p < 0.0001 in the three cases by Fischer's exact test). The values of the metacarpal measurements, anterior height of the dorsal vertebrae from T-4 to T-12, and posterior height from L-1 to L-4 between the premenopausal and postmenopausal groups of women were significantly different (p < 0.001) (Anova test). These findings show the importance of nutrition in the development of bone mass during childhood.

Citing Articles

Hormonal Contraception and Bone Metabolism: Emerging Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies on Post-Pubertal and Reproductive-Age Women.

Tassi A, Londero A, Xholli A, Lanzolla G, Bertozzi S, Savelli L Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 18(1).

PMID: 39861124 PMC: 11768253. DOI: 10.3390/ph18010061.

References
1.
Andresen J, Nielsen H . Assessment of bone mineral content and bone mass by non-invasive radiologic methods. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1986; 27(6):609-17. DOI: 10.1177/028418518602700601. View

2.
Payette H, Gray-Donald K . Dietary intake and biochemical indices of nutritional status in an elderly population, with estimates of the precision of the 7-d food record. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991; 54(3):478-88. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/54.3.478. View

3.
Rico H, Revilla M, Villa L, Cardenas J, Fraile E . Comparison between metacarpal bone measurements by computarized radiogrammetry and total body DEXA in normal and osteoporotic women. Clin Rheumatol. 1994; 13(4):593-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02243000. View

4.
Morrison N, Qi J, Tokita A, Kelly P, Crofts L, Nguyen T . Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature. 1994; 367(6460):284-7. DOI: 10.1038/367284a0. View

5.
Dempster D, Lindsay R . Pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Lancet. 1993; 341(8848):797-801. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90570-7. View