» Articles » PMID: 9157100

Does Functional Communication Training Compete with Ongoing Contingencies of Reinforcement? An Analysis During Response Acquisition and Maintenance

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1997 Apr 1
PMID 9157100
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined the effectiveness of functional communication training (FCT) in reducing self-injurious behavior (SIB) and in shaping an alternative (communicative) response while SIB continued to be reinforced. Following a functional analysis of 3 individuals' SIB, we attempted to teach an alternative response consisting of a manual sign to each individual, using the reinforcer that maintained SIB. When FCT was implemented without extinction. SIB remained at baseline rates for all participants, and none of the participants acquired the alternative response. When extinction was added to the training procedure, SIB decreased and manual signing increased for all participants. To determine if signing, when established, would compete with SIB when both were reinforced, extinction was then withdrawn. Signing was maintained and SIB occurred at low rates for 2 individuals, but SIB returned to baseline rates for the 3rd individual, necessitating the reimplementation of extinction. These results suggest that it may be difficult to establish alternative behaviors if inappropriate behavior continues to be reinforced, but that, when established, alternative behavior might compete successfully with ongoing contingencies of reinforcement for inappropriate behavior.

Citing Articles

Updated Recommendations for Reinforcement Schedule Thinning following Functional Communication Training.

Kranak M, Brown K Behav Anal Pract. 2024; 17(1):87-106.

PMID: 38405284 PMC: 10891008. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00863-4.


Report of the ABAI Task Force on Contingent Electric Skin Shock.

Perone M, Lerman D, Peterson S, Williams D Perspect Behav Sci. 2023; 46(2):261-304.

PMID: 37425985 PMC: 10323060. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-023-00379-w.


Multiple Schedules Facilitate Rapid Noncontingent Reinforcement Schedule Thinning.

Kelley M, Clark R, McGarry K, Henry J, Morgan A, Gadaire D Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(1):185-193.

PMID: 37006419 PMC: 10050655. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-022-00709-5.


Minimizing Escalation by Treating Dangerous Problem Behavior Within an Enhanced Choice Model.

Rajaraman A, Hanley G, Gover H, Staubitz J, Staubitz J, Simcoe K Behav Anal Pract. 2022; 15(1):219-242.

PMID: 35340377 PMC: 8854458. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-020-00548-2.


Resurgence following differential reinforcement of alternative behavior implemented with and without extinction.

Brown K, Greer B, Craig A, Sullivan W, Fisher W, Roane H J Exp Anal Behav. 2020; 113(2):449-467.

PMID: 32133673 PMC: 8111434. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.588.


References
1.
Carr E, Durand V . Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985; 18(2):111-26. PMC: 1307999. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111. View

2.
Bird F, Dores P, Moniz D, Robinson J . Reducing severe aggressive and self-injurious behaviors with functional communication training. Am J Ment Retard. 1989; 94(1):37-48. View

3.
Wacker D, Steege M, Northup J, Sasso G, Berg W, Reimers T . A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990; 23(4):417-29. PMC: 1286258. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-417. View

4.
Durand V, Carr E . Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: maintenance and application in new settings. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991; 24(2):251-64. PMC: 1279571. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-251. View

5.
PECK S, Wacker D, Berg W, Cooper L, Brown K, Richman D . Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(3):263-90. PMC: 1283989. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263. View