» Articles » PMID: 21541152

Component Analyses Using Single-subject Experimental Designs: a Review

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2011 May 5
PMID 21541152
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A component analysis is a systematic assessment of 2 or more independent variables or components that comprise a treatment package. Component analyses are important for the analysis of behavior; however, previous research provides only cursory descriptions of the topic. Therefore, in this review the definition of component analysis is discussed, and a notation system for evaluating the experimental designs of component analyses is described. Thirty articles that included a component analysis were identified via a literature search. The majority of the studies successfully identified a necessary component; however, most of these studies did not evaluate the sufficiency of the necessary component. The notation system may be helpful in developing experimental designs that best suit the purpose of studies aimed at conducting component analyses of treatment packages.

Citing Articles

Self-Control Training: A Scoping Review.

Finch K, Chalme R, Kestner K, Sarno B Behav Anal Pract. 2024; 17(1):137-156.

PMID: 38405281 PMC: 10890997. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00885-y.


The benefits of single-subject research designs and multi-methodological approaches for neuroscience research.

Becker A Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1190412.

PMID: 37954937 PMC: 10634204. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1190412.


A Component Analysis of Skill Acquisition Consequences with Listener Responses.

Zhi H, Fienup D, Chan K, Cariveau T J Behav Educ. 2023; :1-28.

PMID: 37359172 PMC: 9992908. DOI: 10.1007/s10864-023-09509-5.


The Family of Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Epstein L, Dallery J Harv Data Sci Rev. 2023; 4(SI3).

PMID: 36926648 PMC: 10016625. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.ff9300a8.


Toward deeper understanding and wide-scale implementation of naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions.

DAgostino S, Duenas A, Bravo A, Tyson K, Straiton D, Salvatore G Autism. 2022; 27(1):253-258.

PMID: 36056601 PMC: 9797432. DOI: 10.1177/13623613221121427.


References
1.
Hanley G, Iwata B, Thompson R, Lindberg J . A component analysis of "stereotypy as reinforcement" for alternative behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(3):285-97. PMC: 1284250. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-285. View

2.
Baer D, Wolf M, Risley T . Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968; 1(1):91-7. PMC: 1310980. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. View

3.
Cooper L, Wacker D, McComas J, Brown K, PECK S, Richman D . Use of component analyses to identify active variables in treatment packages for children with feeding disorders. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995; 28(2):139-53. PMC: 1279806. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-139. View

4.
Jones R . Reducing stereotyped behavior: a component analysis of the DRI schedule. Br J Clin Psychol. 1989; 28(3):255-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1989.tb01375.x. View

5.
Roscoe E, Fisher W, Glover A, Volkert V . Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments. J Appl Behav Anal. 2006; 39(1):63-77. PMC: 1389611. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2006.7-05. View