» Articles » PMID: 9020218

Hip Joint Forces During Load Carrying

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1997 Feb 1
PMID 9020218
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In some diseases affecting only 1 hip joint, it is necessary to keep the contact force between femoral head and acetabulum (hip joint force) permanently low at the affected side. Six subjects were examined while they were walking and carrying a load in 1 or 2 hands. It was determined how the forces in both hip joints are influenced by the magnitude of the load and the manner in which it is carried. A mathematical model was used to calculate the maximum forces in the frontal plane. One subject had instrumented endoprostheses implanted in both hips. For him the measured values were slightly higher than the calculated ones, but the overall results were similar. Carrying a load on 1 side keeps the force constant at the ipsilateral hip joint or even slightly lowers it. At the same time, there is a large increase on the opposite side. Carrying 25% of body weight with 1 hand causes about 2/3 higher forces in the contralateral joint than on the loaded side. If this load is evenly distributed between the 2 sides, both hip joint forces increase by 25%. In unilateral load carrying, additional relief of the ipsilateral joint can be achieved if the upper body is held upright and the loadcarrying arm is abducted, such as when using a large shopping basket.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed versus modular hemipelvic prostheses for limb-salvage reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection: a mid-term retrospective cohort study.

Hu X, Wen Y, Lu M, Luo Y, Zhou Y, Yang X J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):258.

PMID: 38654343 PMC: 11040966. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04697-w.


Three-dimensional reduction and finite element analysis improves the treatment of pelvic malunion reconstructive surgery: A case report.

Kurz S, Pieroh P, Lenk M, Josten C, Bohme J Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(42):e8136.

PMID: 29049196 PMC: 5662362. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008136.


In Vivo Damage of the Head-Neck Junction in Hard-on-Hard Total Hip Replacements: Effect of Femoral Head Size, Metal Combination, and 12/14 Taper Design.

Baleani M, Erani P, Bordini B, Zuccheri F, Makosa M, Pasquale D Materials (Basel). 2017; 10(7).

PMID: 28773095 PMC: 5551776. DOI: 10.3390/ma10070733.


[Hip arthroplasty in the presence of proximal femoral deformity].

Rakow A, Simon P, Perka C Orthopade. 2015; 44(7):510-1, 514-22.

PMID: 26103936 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-015-3123-y.


In vivo evaluation of edge-loading in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients with pseudotumours.

Kwon Y, Mellon S, Monk P, Murray D, Gill H Bone Joint Res. 2013; 1(4):42-9.

PMID: 23610670 PMC: 3626206. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.14.2000019.