» Articles » PMID: 8955415

Analysis of the Region Between Amino Acids 30 and 42 of Intact UmuD by a Monocysteine Approach

Overview
Journal J Bacteriol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1996 Dec 1
PMID 8955415
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

On the basis of characterizations of a set of UmuD monocysteine derivatives, we had suggested that positions 24, 34, and 44 are closer to the intact UmuD homodimer interface than other positions tested (M. H. Lee, T. Ohta, and G. C. Walker, J. Bacteriol. 176:4825-4837, 1994). Because this region of UmuD also appeared to be important for interactions with RecA, we followed up on our previous study by constructing a second set of monocysteine UmuD derivatives with single cysteine substitutions at positions 30 to 42. We found that like the VC34 mutant, UmuD derivatives with monocysteine substitutions at positions 32 and 35 showed deficiencies in in vivo and in vitro RecA-mediated cleavage as well as in UV mutagenesis, suggesting that the position 32 to 35 region may be important for RecA-mediated cleavage of UmuD. Interestingly, UmuD with monocysteine substitutions at residues 33 and 40 showed a reduction in UV mutagenesis while retaining the ability to be cleaved by RecA in vivo, suggesting a deficiency in the subsequent role of the UmuD' derivatives in mutagenesis. All of the UmuD monocysteine derivatives in the position 30 to 42 series purified indistinguishably from the wild-type protein. The observations that purified proteins of the UmuD derivatives RC37 and IC38 could be disulfide cross-linked quantitatively upon addition of iodine and yet were poorly modified with iodoacetate led us to suggest that the pairs of residues at positions 37 and 38 are extremely close to the UmuD2 homodimer interface. These observations indicate that the structure of the UmuD2 homodimer in solution is very different from the crystal structure of the UmuD'2 homodimer reported by Peat et al. (T. S. Peat, E. G. Frank, J. P. McDonald, A. S. Levine, R. Woodgate, and W. A. Hendrickson, Nature [London] 380:727-730, 1996).

Citing Articles

The response of Escherichia coli to the alkylating agents chloroacetaldehyde and styrene oxide.

Muenter M, Aiken A, Akanji J, Baig S, Bellou S, Carlson A Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2019; 840:1-10.

PMID: 30857727 PMC: 6525637. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.02.001.


Altering the N-terminal arms of the polymerase manager protein UmuD modulates protein interactions.

Murison D, Ollivierre J, Huang Q, Budil D, Beuning P PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173388.

PMID: 28273172 PMC: 5342242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173388.


Translesion DNA Synthesis.

Vaisman A, McDonald J, Woodgate R EcoSal Plus. 2015; 5(1).

PMID: 26442823 PMC: 4231548. DOI: 10.1128/ecosalplus.7.2.2.


Characterization of Escherichia coli UmuC active-site loops identifies variants that confer UV hypersensitivity.

Hawver L, Gillooly C, Beuning P J Bacteriol. 2011; 193(19):5400-11.

PMID: 21784925 PMC: 3187380. DOI: 10.1128/JB.05301-11.


The dimeric SOS mutagenesis protein UmuD is active as a monomer.

Ollivierre J, Sikora J, Beuning P J Biol Chem. 2010; 286(5):3607-17.

PMID: 21118802 PMC: 3030365. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.167254.


References
1.
Sommer S, Bailone A, Devoret R . The appearance of the UmuD'C protein complex in Escherichia coli switches repair from homologous recombination to SOS mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol. 1993; 10(5):963-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00968.x. View

2.
Lee M, Ohta T, Walker G . A monocysteine approach for probing the structure and interactions of the UmuD protein. J Bacteriol. 1994; 176(16):4825-37. PMC: 196316. DOI: 10.1128/jb.176.16.4825-4837.1994. View

3.
Peat T, Frank E, Mcdonald J, Levine A, Woodgate R, Hendrickson W . Structure of the UmuD' protein and its regulation in response to DNA damage. Nature. 1996; 380(6576):727-30. DOI: 10.1038/380727a0. View

4.
Lee M, Walker G . Interactions of Escherichia coli UmuD with activated RecA analyzed by cross-linking UmuD monocysteine derivatives. J Bacteriol. 1996; 178(24):7285-94. PMC: 178645. DOI: 10.1128/jb.178.24.7285-7294.1996. View

5.
Shinagawa H, Iwasaki H, Kato T, Nakata A . RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988; 85(6):1806-10. PMC: 279868. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1806. View