Shetabi H, Naserzadeh Z
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024; 12(2):58-66.
PMID: 39224468
PMC: 11366265.
DOI: 10.30476/BEAT.2024.101902.1499.
Castillo-Monzon C, Gaszynski T, Marroquin-Valz H, Orozco-Montes J, Ratajczyk P
J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).
PMID: 37629238
PMC: 10455808.
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165197.
Prim T, Brogly N, Guasch E, Diez J, Gilsanz F
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023; 38(1):37-45.
PMID: 37540323
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-023-01061-x.
Mani S, Pinheiro J, Rawat M
Children (Basel). 2022; 9(5).
PMID: 35626910
PMC: 9139380.
DOI: 10.3390/children9050733.
Arican S, Pekcan S, Hacibeyoglu G, Yusifov M, Yuce S, Tuncer Uzun S
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021; 71(5):523-529.
PMID: 34537123
PMC: 9373655.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.014.
Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study.
Shyam T, Selvaraj V
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 37(1):108-113.
PMID: 34103833
PMC: 8174429.
DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_60_19.
Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.
Kim G, Kim J, Kim S, Moon Y, Park E, Park S
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019; 19(1):4.
PMID: 30611202
PMC: 6320569.
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-018-0674-6.
Insertion of i-gel™ by the reversed technique improves the success rate and reduces the time taken for its placement: A prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional trial.
Sharda M, Kapoor M, Atray R, Garg S
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 33(2):226-230.
PMID: 28781450
PMC: 5520597.
DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_395_16.
A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial for the Comparison of Two Techniques for the Insertion of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adults-Index Finger Insertion Technique versus 90° Rotation Technique.
Dhulkhed P, Khyadi S, Jamale P, Dhulkhed V
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017; 45(2):98-102.
PMID: 28439442
PMC: 5396907.
DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.70298.
Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Park J, Lee J, Nam S, Ju J, Kim M
Yonsei Med J. 2016; 57(4):987-97.
PMID: 27189296
PMC: 4951479.
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.987.
Novel technique for placement of laryngeal mask airway in difficult pediatric airways.
Roodneshin F, Agah M
Tanaffos. 2014; 10(2):56-68.
PMID: 25191364
PMC: 4153147.
Gender differences in sore throat and hoarseness following endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway: a prospective study.
Jaensson M, Gupta A, Nilsson U
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014; 14:56.
PMID: 25061426
PMC: 4110067.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-56.
A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant.
Park P, Choi G, Kim W, Yang S, Shin H, Kang H
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014; 66(2):105-11.
PMID: 24624267
PMC: 3948436.
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.105.
Laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults: comparison between fully deflated and partially inflated technique.
An J, Shin S, Kim K
Yonsei Med J. 2013; 54(3):747-51.
PMID: 23549825
PMC: 3635636.
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.747.
Insertion of LMA Classic™ with and without digital intraoral manipulation in anesthetized unparalyzed patients.
Krishna H, Kamath S, Shenoy L
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 28(4):481-5.
PMID: 23225929
PMC: 3511946.
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.101923.
Laryngeal mask airway vs the endotracheal tube in paediatric airway management: A meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.
Patki A
Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(5):537-41.
PMID: 22174478
PMC: 3237161.
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.89900.
Lower intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway in the lateral and prone positions compared with that in the supine position.
Yano T, Imaizumi T, Uneda C, Nakayama R
J Anesth. 2008; 22(3):312-6.
PMID: 18685943
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-008-0635-1.
[Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].
Hillebrand H, Motsch J
Anaesthesist. 2007; 56(6):617-30.
PMID: 17520229
DOI: 10.1007/s00101-007-1198-5.
Laryngeal mask insertion with a laryngoscope in paediatric patients.
Elwood T, Cox R
Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43(5 Pt 1):435-7.
PMID: 8723847
DOI: 10.1007/BF03018102.
The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis.
Brimacombe J
Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42(11):1017-23.
PMID: 8590490
DOI: 10.1007/BF03011075.