» Articles » PMID: 18685943

Lower Intracuff Pressure of Laryngeal Mask Airway in the Lateral and Prone Positions Compared with That in the Supine Position

Overview
Journal J Anesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2008 Aug 8
PMID 18685943
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared the intracuff pressure (ICP) of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the lateral and prone positions with that in the supine position. One hundred and eight patients, weighing 50-70 kg, scheduled for elective orthopedic and plastic surgery, were assigned to three groups, based on their body position during surgery. General anesthesia was induced and then a size 4 deflated LMA was inserted in each patient in the supine (group 1; n = 42), lateral (group 2; n = 45), or prone position (group 3; n = 21). The LMA cuff was inflated with 15 ml of air. Anesthesia was maintained without nitrous oxide, and the ICP was measured until LMA removal in the supine position. ICP in groups 2 and 3 was significantly lower than that in group 1 from immediately after insertion to the end of surgery. After surgery, turning from the lateral (group 2) or prone (group 3) position to the supine position significantly raised the ICP. Because the ICP is related to the seal pressure of the LMA and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity, we recommend evaluating and adjusting the ICP appropriately in each body position.

Citing Articles

Effect of the new video laryngeal mask airway SaCoVLM on airway management in lateral laparoscopic urological surgery: A single center randomized controlled trial.

Sun Y, Zhang M, Gao X, Gao Z, Zou T, Guo Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2132.

PMID: 38272937 PMC: 10810894. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51856-4.


The prone position during surgery and its complications: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines.

Kwee M, Ho Y, Rozen W Int Surg. 2015; 100(2):292-303.

PMID: 25692433 PMC: 4337445. DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00256.1.


The effect of head rotation on efficiency of ventilation and cuff pressure using the PLMA in pediatric patients.

Park H, Han J, Kim Y Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011; 61(3):220-4.

PMID: 22025944 PMC: 3198183. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.3.220.

References
1.
Keller C, Brimacombe J . Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 83(3):480-2. DOI: 10.1093/bja/83.3.480. View

2.
Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Barry J, Mecklem D, Blinco A . Emergence characteristics and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of high versus low initial cuff volume. Anaesthesia. 2000; 55(4):338-43. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01285.x. View

3.
Verghese C, Smith T, Young E . Prospective survey of the use of the laryngeal mask airway in 2359 patients. Anaesthesia. 1993; 48(1):58-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb06794.x. View

4.
Pevernagie D, W Stanson A, Sheedy 2nd P, Daniels B, Shepard Jr J . Effects of body position on the upper airway of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995; 152(1):179-85. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599821. View

5.
Brimacombe J . Positive pressure ventilation with the size 5 laryngeal mask. J Clin Anesth. 1997; 9(2):113-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00233-X. View