» Articles » PMID: 34537123

The Place of Ultrasonography in Confirming the Position of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients: an Observational Study

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2021 Sep 19
PMID 34537123
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Laryngeal mask airways are increasingly used as supraglottic devices during general anesthesia. Ultrasonography can provide a dynamic image simultaneous to placing the supraglottic airway device. In the current study, the incidence of suboptimal laryngeal mask airway position and replacement in children was evaluated using simultaneous ultrasonographic imaging.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 82 patients aged 3-15 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II. Patients under general anesthesia and with airway provided by a laryngeal mask airway were included. The position of the laryngeal mask airway was evaluated by ultrasonography on two planes. According to our scoring system, Grade I and Grade II were determined to indicate acceptable placement, while Grade III was determined to indicate unacceptable placement. Suboptimal laryngeal mask airway placement rates and the requirement of replacement were determined. Laryngeal mask airway placement optimized by ultrasonography was evaluated with both leak tests and a fiberoptic laryngoscope.

Results: The average age of the patients was 6.27 ± 4.66 years. After evaluation with ultrasonography, 65 (79.3%) of the laryngeal mask airways were found to be optimally positioned, while the position of 13 (15.9%) had to be corrected, and 4 (4.9%) had to be replaced. There was a moderate positive correlation between the ultrasonographic evaluation and leak test evaluation (p < 0.001; r = 0.628). Relocation of the laryngeal mask airway was determined to be an independent risk factor affecting the development of complications (OR = 2.961; p = 0.046; 95% Cl 2.850-30.745).

Conclusion: The use of ultrasonography to verify and relocate laryngeal mask airway placement is noninvasive and effective.

Citing Articles

Supraglottic Airway Devices with Vision Guided Systems: Third Generation of Supraglottic Airway Devices.

Castillo-Monzon C, Gaszynski T, Marroquin-Valz H, Orozco-Montes J, Ratajczyk P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37629238 PMC: 10455808. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165197.


Use of ultrasonography in confirming the malposition of the i-gel in pediatric patients: a prospective observational study.

Cicekci F, Uluer M, Sargin M, Aslanlar E, Kara I, Korez M Turk J Med Sci. 2022; 52(4):997-1005.

PMID: 36326371 PMC: 10387856. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5401.

References
1.
Karippacheril J, Varghese E . Crossover comparison of airway sealing pressures of 1.5 and 2 size LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in children, measured with the manometric stability test. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011; 21(6):668-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03554.x. View

2.
Cooke M, Wei S . A comparative study of southern Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards. Angle Orthod. 1989; 59(2):131-8. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1989)059<0131:ACSOSC>2.0.CO;2. View

3.
Alzahem A, Aqil M, Alzahrani T, Aljazaeri A . Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures. A randomized controlled trial. Saudi Med J. 2017; 38(5):482-490. PMC: 5447208. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2017.5.17960. View

4.
Tsujimura Y . Downfolding of the epiglottis induced by the laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001; 11(6):651-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00749.x. View

5.
Daya H, Fawcett W, Weir N . Vocal fold palsy after use of the laryngeal mask airway. J Laryngol Otol. 1996; 110(4):383-4. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100133699. View