» Articles » PMID: 8244362

Cervical Sampling for Diagnosis of Genital Chlamydial Infection with a New Brush Device

Overview
Journal Genitourin Med
Date 1993 Oct 1
PMID 8244362
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare a new sampling device, a brush, Accellone-Multi-Instrument (AMI), with a dacron-tipped swab for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens, and to evaluate if consecutive multiple cervical sampling as compared with such a single specimen would increase the sensitivity.

Methods: 501 females attending an STD clinic and 172 females attending a family planning clinic were examined prospectively. Two cervical specimens were collected from each woman. C trachomatis were detected by culture or enzyme immunoassay (IDEIA-III). Positive EIA samples were confirmed by a direct immunofluorescent test.

Results: When cervical specimens were collected with the brush as the first device, 92% of the culture-positive cases were detected, and when the samples were collected with the dacron-tipped-swab first, 84% of the culture-positive cases were detected (p < 0.05). The first collected specimen detected 89% of the culture-positive cases and 81% of those that were positive by IDEIA.

Conclusions: The study indicates that the AMI brush is superior to non-toxic, dacron-tipped swabs for detection of C trachomatis in cervical samples by cell culture but not by ELISA, and that the sensitivity could be improved by analysing multiple cervical samples.

Citing Articles

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction.

Bassiri M, Hu H, Domeika M, Burczak J, Svensson L, Lee H J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33(4):898-900.

PMID: 7790456 PMC: 228063. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.898-900.1995.

References
1.
Lees M, Newnan D, Plackett M, Traynor P, Forsyth J, Garland S . A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture. Genitourin Med. 1990; 66(4):267-9. PMC: 1194528. DOI: 10.1136/sti.66.4.267. View

2.
Szarewski A, Pompey A, Bertrand J, Bradbeer C . Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling. Genitourin Med. 1990; 66(3):205-7. PMC: 1194504. DOI: 10.1136/sti.66.3.205. View

3.
Svensson L, Mares I, OLSSON S, Nordstrom M . Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and aspects of the laboratory diagnostics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991; 70(7-8):587-90. DOI: 10.3109/00016349109007921. View

4.
Kellogg J, Seiple J, Klinedinst J, Levisky J . Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992; 30(11):2988-90. PMC: 270565. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2988-2990.1992. View

5.
Mardh P, Zeeberg B . Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures. Br J Vener Dis. 1981; 57(4):268-72. PMC: 1045939. DOI: 10.1136/sti.57.4.268. View