Detecting Chlamydia Trachomatis by Direct Immunofluorescence Using a Cytobrush Sampling Technique
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We compared two different methods of collecting endocervical samples for examination by direct immunofluorescence for Chlamydia trachomatis. A cervical Cytobrush gave better results than a dacron swab. Further studies should be performed to assess the value of alternative sampling methods to detect this organism.
Cervical sampling for diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection with a new brush device.
Svensson L, Domeika M, Mardh P Genitourin Med. 1993; 69(5):397-9.
PMID: 8244362 PMC: 1195127. DOI: 10.1136/sti.69.5.397.
Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Moncada J, Schachter J, Shipp M, Bolan G, Wilber J J Clin Microbiol. 1989; 27(8):1863-6.
PMID: 2671035 PMC: 267685. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1863-1866.1989.
Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence using a Cytobrush sampling technique.
Taylor-Robinson D Genitourin Med. 1989; 65(2):130.
PMID: 2666301 PMC: 1194308. DOI: 10.1136/sti.65.2.130.
Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling.
Szarewski A, Pompey A, Bertrand J, Bradbeer C Genitourin Med. 1990; 66(3):205-7.
PMID: 2370065 PMC: 1194504. DOI: 10.1136/sti.66.3.205.
Schwebke J, Stamm W, Handsfield H J Clin Microbiol. 1990; 28(11):2473-6.
PMID: 2254422 PMC: 268208. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2473-2476.1990.