» Articles » PMID: 6268242

Toxic Effect of Sampling Swabs and Transportation Test Tubes on the Formation of Intracytoplasmic Inclusions of Chlamydia Trachomatis in McCoy Cell Cultures

Overview
Journal Br J Vener Dis
Date 1981 Aug 1
PMID 6268242
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability of Chlamydia trachomatis, immunotype E, to produce intracytoplasmic inclusions in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells after being exposed to different types of sampling swabs in experimentally infected transport medium was studied. A larger number of inclusions was obtained with cotton-tipped aluminium and rayon-tipped plastic swabs than with calcium-alginate-tipped aluminium and cotton-tipped wooden swabs (P less than 0.0001). Transport medium stored in glass tubes caused a cytopathic effect when inoculated on to McCoy cell cultures; no such effect occurred with plastic tubes. When cotton-tipped aluminium instead of calcium-alginate-tipped aluminium swabs were used to collect 50 make urethral specimens significantly more were chlamydia-positive (P less than 0.025). This was also true when cotton-tipped aluminium swabs were used instead of alginate-tipped swabs in a study of 123 cervical specimens (P less than 0.01). When the calcium-alginate-tipped aluminium and cotton-tipped wooden swabs were shaken in the transport medium after sampling from the male urethra and the cervix, instead of being left in the medium during transport to the laboratory, more specimens were chlamydia-positive and a greater number of chlamydial inclusions were found per culture-positive sample; these results were, however, not statistically significant (P greater than 0.05).

Citing Articles

Rapid screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection by detecting α-mannosidase activity in urogenital tract specimens.

Wang Z, Fu G, Wang S, Qin D, Wang Z, Cui J BMC Infect Dis. 2013; 13:36.

PMID: 23347393 PMC: 3568413. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-36.


Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital swabs: comparison of commercial and in house amplification methods with culture.

Shattock R, Patrizio C, Simmonds P, Sutherland S Sex Transm Infect. 1999; 74(4):289-93.

PMID: 9924472 PMC: 1758124. DOI: 10.1136/sti.74.4.289.


Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Black C Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997; 10(1):160-84.

PMID: 8993862 PMC: 172947. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.10.1.160.


Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Davies H, Wang E CMAJ. 1996; 154(11):1631-44.

PMID: 8646651 PMC: 1487928.


Cervical sampling for diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection with a new brush device.

Svensson L, Domeika M, Mardh P Genitourin Med. 1993; 69(5):397-9.

PMID: 8244362 PMC: 1195127. DOI: 10.1136/sti.69.5.397.


References
1.
GORDON F, Harper I, QUAN A, TREHARNE J, Dwyer R, GARLAND J . Detection of Chlamydia (Bedsonia) in certain infections of man. I. Laboratory procedures: comparison of yolk sac and cell culture for detection and isolation. J Infect Dis. 1969; 120(4):451-62. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/120.4.451. View

2.
COLLEEN S, Mardh P, Schytz A . Magnesium and zinc in seminal fluid of healthy males and patients with non-acute prostatitis with and without gonorrhoea. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1975; 9(3):192-7. DOI: 10.3109/00365597509134210. View

3.
Ripa K, Mardh P . Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells. J Clin Microbiol. 1977; 6(4):328-31. PMC: 274768. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.328-331.1977. View

4.
Evans R, Taylor-Robinson D . Comparison of various McCoy cell treatment procedures used for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1979; 10(2):198-201. PMC: 273128. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.198-201.1979. View