» Articles » PMID: 7811608

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Flow Imaging

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Q
Specialty Radiology
Date 1994 Sep 1
PMID 7811608
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Time-of-flight and phase shift methods have both been used for vascular imaging with magnetic resonance. Phase methods, and phase contrast in particular, are well suited to quantitative measurements of velocity and volume flow rate. The most robust methods for measuring flow encode through-plane velocity into phase shift and compute flow by integrating the measured velocity over the vessel lumen. The accuracy of the flow data can be degraded by the effects of acceleration and eddy currents and by partial volume effects, including the effects of finite slice thickness and resolution, pulsatile waveforms, motion, and chemical shift. The reproducibility depends on the signal-to-noise of the data and the strength of the flow encoding and can be degraded by inconsistent definition of the vessel boundary. The adjustable flow sensitivity inherent in this method is a particular asset, allowing phase contrast flow measurement to operate over a dynamic range exceeding 10(5). Recently developed rapid imaging methods are helpful in applications that would be compromised by respiratory motion. With care, excellent quantitative data can be quickly obtained in vivo, and the resulting flow information is valuable for the diagnosis and management of a variety of conditions.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Immersed Boundary Simulations of Heart Valve Hemodynamics Against In Vitro 4D Flow MRI Data.

Kaiser A, Schiavone N, Elkins C, McElhinney D, Eaton J, Marsden A Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 51(10):2267-2288.

PMID: 37378877 PMC: 10775908. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03266-2.


Automatic 4D Flow MRI Segmentation Using the Standardized Difference of Means Velocity.

Rothenberger S, Patel N, Zhang J, Schnell S, Craig B, Ansari S IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2023; 42(8):2360-2373.

PMID: 37028010 PMC: 10474251. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2023.3251734.


Modeling Bias Error in 4D Flow MRI Velocity Measurements.

Rothenberger S, Zhang J, Brindise M, Schnell S, Markl M, Vlachos P IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022; 41(7):1802-1812.

PMID: 35130153 PMC: 9247036. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3149421.


Human upper-airway respiratory airflow: In vivo comparison of computational fluid dynamics simulations and hyperpolarized 129Xe phase contrast MRI velocimetry.

Xiao Q, Stewart N, Willmering M, Gunatilaka C, Thomen R, Schuh A PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256460.

PMID: 34411195 PMC: 8376109. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256460.


Importance of complex blood flow in the assessment of aortic regurgitation severity using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Truedsson F, Polte C, Gao S, Johnsson A, Bech-Hanssen O, Lagerstrand K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 37(12):3561-3572.

PMID: 34273066 PMC: 8604828. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02341-w.