» Articles » PMID: 35130153

Modeling Bias Error in 4D Flow MRI Velocity Measurements

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 7
PMID 35130153
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a model to estimate the bias error of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) velocity measurements. The local instantaneous bias error is defined as the difference between the expectation of the voxel's measured velocity and actual velocity at the voxel center. The model accounts for bias error introduced by the intra-voxel velocity distribution and partial volume (PV) effects. We assess the intra-voxel velocity distribution using a 3D Taylor Series expansion. PV effects and numerical errors are considered using a Richardson extrapolation. The model is applied to synthetic Womersley flow and in vitro and in vivo 4D flow MRI measurements in a cerebral aneurysm. The bias error model is valid for measurements with at least 3.75 voxels across the vessel diameter and signal-to-noise ratio greater than 5. All test cases exceeded this diameter to voxel size ratio with diameters, isotropic voxel sizes, and velocity ranging from 3-15mm, 0.5-1mm, and 0-60cm/s, respectively. The model accurately estimates the bias error in voxels not affected by PV effects. In PV voxels, the bias error is an order of magnitude higher, and the accuracy of the bias error estimation in PV voxels ranges from 67.3% to 108% relative to the actual bias error. The bias error estimated for in vivo measurements increased two-fold at systole compared to diastole in partial volume and non-partial volume voxels, suggesting the bias error varies over the cardiac cycle. This bias error model quantifies 4D flow MRI measurement accuracy and can help plan 4D flow MRI scans.

Citing Articles

Transfer learning on physics-informed neural networks for tracking the hemodynamics in the evolving false lumen of dissected aorta.

Daneker M, Cai S, Qian Y, Myzelev E, Kumbhat A, Li H Nexus. 2025; 1(2).

PMID: 39949515 PMC: 11824901. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynexs.2024.100016.


Super-Resolving and Denoising 4D flow MRI of Neurofluids Using Physics-Guided Neural Networks.

Patel N, Bartusiak E, Rothenberger S, Schwichtenberg A, Delp E, Rayz V Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(2):331-347.

PMID: 39223318 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03606-w.


Generalized Super-Resolution 4D Flow MRI - Using Ensemble Learning to Extend Across the Cardiovascular System.

Ericsson L, Hjalmarsson A, Akbar M, Ferdian E, Bonini M, Hardy B IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2024; 28(12):7239-7250.

PMID: 39012742 PMC: 11735690. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3429291.


Enhancing the implantation of mechanical circulatory support devices using computational simulations.

Lopez-Santana G, De Rosis A, Grant S, Venkateswaran R, Keshmiri A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1279268.

PMID: 38737533 PMC: 11084291. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1279268.


Generalized super-resolution 4D Flow MRI-using ensemble learning to extend across the cardiovascular system.

Ericsson L, Hjalmarsson A, Akbar M, Ferdian E, Bonini M, Hardy B ArXiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38045482 PMC: 10690302.


References
1.
Polzin J, Alley M, Korosec F, Grist T, Wang Y, Mistretta C . A complex-difference phase-contrast technique for measurement of volume flow rates. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995; 5(2):129-37. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880050202. View

2.
Stalder A, Russe M, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M . Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 60(5):1218-31. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21778. View

3.
Schnell S, Ansari S, Wu C, Garcia J, Murphy I, Rahman O . Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017; 46(1):102-114. PMC: 5464980. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25595. View

4.
Szajer J, Ho-Shon K . A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017; 48:62-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.005. View

5.
Bieging E, Frydrychowicz A, Wentland A, Landgraf B, Johnson K, Wieben O . In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(3):589-97. PMC: 3078726. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22485. View