» Articles » PMID: 26611470

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Blood Flow Regularized by 3D Phase Contrast MRI

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Nov 28
PMID 26611470
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is used clinically for quantitative assessment of cardiovascular flow and function, as it is capable of providing directly-measured 3D velocity maps. Alternatively, vascular flow can be estimated from model-based computation fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. CFD provides arbitrarily high resolution, but its accuracy hinges on model assumptions, while velocity fields measured with PC-MRI generally do not satisfy the equations of fluid dynamics, provide limited resolution, and suffer from partial volume effects. The purpose of this study is to develop a proof-of-concept numerical procedure for constructing a simulated flow field that is influenced by both direct PC-MRI measurements and a fluid physics model, thereby taking advantage of both the accuracy of PC-MRI and the high spatial resolution of CFD. The use of the proposed approach in regularizing 3D flow fields is evaluated.

Methods: The proposed algorithm incorporates both a Newtonian fluid physics model and a linear PC-MRI signal model. The model equations are solved numerically using a modified CFD algorithm. The numerical solution corresponds to the optimal solution of a generalized Tikhonov regularization, which provides a flow field that satisfies the flow physics equations, while being close enough to the measured PC-MRI velocity profile. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated on data from the carotid bifurcation of one healthy volunteer, and also from a pulsatile carotid flow phantom.

Results: The proposed solver produces flow fields that are in better agreement with direct PC-MRI measurements than CFD alone, and converges faster, while closely satisfying the fluid dynamics equations. For the implementation that provided the best results, the signal-to-error ratio (with respect to the PC-MRI measurements) in the phantom experiment was 6.56 dB higher than that of conventional CFD; in the in vivo experiment, it was 2.15 dB higher.

Conclusions: The proposed approach allows partial or complete measurements to be incorporated into a modified CFD solver, for improving the accuracy of the resulting flow fields estimates. This can be used for reducing scan time, increasing the spatial resolution, and/or denoising the PC-MRI measurements.

Citing Articles

Comparison of stable carotid plaques in patients with mild-to-moderate carotid stenosis with vulnerable plaques in patients with significant carotid stenosis.

Liu Y, Wu B, Wu S, Liu Z, Wang P, Lv Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(48):e40613.

PMID: 39612378 PMC: 11608718. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040613.


Super-Resolving and Denoising 4D flow MRI of Neurofluids Using Physics-Guided Neural Networks.

Patel N, Bartusiak E, Rothenberger S, Schwichtenberg A, Delp E, Rayz V Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(2):331-347.

PMID: 39223318 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03606-w.


Application of physics-based flow models in cardiovascular medicine: Current practices and challenges.

Vardhan M, Randles A Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 2(1):011302.

PMID: 38505399 PMC: 10903374. DOI: 10.1063/5.0040315.


Patient-Specific Inverse Modeling of In Vivo Cardiovascular Mechanics with Medical Image-Derived Kinematics as Input Data: Concepts, Methods, and Applications.

Bracamonte J, Saunders S, Wilson J, Truong U, Soares J Appl Sci (Basel). 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 36911244 PMC: 10004130. DOI: 10.3390/app12083954.


Recent developments in modeling, imaging, and monitoring of cardiovascular diseases using machine learning.

Moradi H, Al-Hourani A, Concilia G, Khoshmanesh F, Nezami F, Needham S Biophys Rev. 2023; 15(1):19-33.

PMID: 36909958 PMC: 9995635. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-022-01040-7.


References
1.
Long Q, Xu X, Ariff B, Thom S, Hughes A, Stanton A . Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and MRI study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11(3):299-311. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(200003)11:3<299::aid-jmri9>3.0.co;2-m. View

2.
Hyun S, Kleinstreuer C, Archie Jr J . Hemodynamics analyses of arterial expansions with implications to thrombosis and restenosis. Med Eng Phys. 2000; 22(1):13-27. DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(00)00006-0. View

3.
Papaharilaou Y, Doorly D, Sherwin S . Assessing the accuracy of two-dimensional phase-contrast MRI measurements of complex unsteady flows. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 14(6):714-23. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10008. View

4.
Steinman D, Thomas J, Ladak H, Milner J, Rutt B, Spence J . Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47(1):149-59. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10025. View

5.
Tsuji T, Suzuki J, Shimamoto R, Yamazaki T, Nakajima T, Nagai R . Vector analysis of the wall shear rate at the human aortoiliac bifurcation using cine MR velocity mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178(4):995-9. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.4.1780995. View