» Articles » PMID: 7640353

Characterization and Expression of RpoC2 in CMS and Fertile Lines of Sorghum

Overview
Journal Plant Mol Biol
Date 1995 Aug 1
PMID 7640353
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A 165 bp deletion in the middle of rpoC2, the plastid gene which encodes the RNA polymerase beta" subunit, was identified in the small-anthered types of CMS sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.). Moench, containing A1, A2, A5, and A6 cytoplasms. It was previously shown that the amino acid sequence deleted in these CMS lines is in a monocot-specific region that contains several protein motifs that are characteristic of several transcription factors. Using primers flanking the deletion in PCR analyses, various types of CMS lines, some of which are used in hybrid sorghum production, were classified into two groups. CMS lines containing A1, A2, A5, A6 cytoplasms display the deletion in rpoC2. These lines have small anthers in which pollen development is arrested at an early stage and in which usually only empty exines are found. CMS lines containing A3, A4, and 9E cytoplasms do not possess the deletion. These lines have large anthers in which pollen degenerates at a later stage. Run-on transcription assays using 15 chloroplast genes showed that chloroplast gene transcription rates are similar in CMS and fertile (maintainer and restorer) lines and F1 in seedling leaves. Analyses of RNA blots indicated that rbcL, rpoB and rpoC2 transcripts are accumulated mainly in the leaves and low in the inflorescence tissues and pollen. These data document plastid gene expression in leaves and non-photosynthetic tissues from CMS and fertile lines of sorghum.

Citing Articles

Development of InDels markers for the identification of cytoplasmic male sterility in by complete chloroplast genome sequences analysis.

Choe M, Kim J, Syed Nabi R, Han S, Cho K Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1188149.

PMID: 37528970 PMC: 10388542. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1188149.


Chimeric deletion mutation of rpoC2 underlies the leaf-patterning of Clivia miniata var. variegata.

Wu Y, Zheng Y, Xu W, Zhang Z, Li L, Wang Y Plant Cell Rep. 2023; 42(9):1419-1431.

PMID: 37326841 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-023-03039-0.


Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of seven extant Citrullus species insight into genetic variation, phylogenetic relationships, and selective pressure.

Zhou C, Wang P, Zeng Q, Zeng R, Hu W, Sun L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6779.

PMID: 37185306 PMC: 10130142. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34046-6.


Comparative Plastome Analysis of Three Amaryllidaceae Subfamilies: Insights into Variation of Genome Characteristics, Phylogeny, and Adaptive Evolution.

Cheng R, Xie D, Zhang X, Fu X, He X, Zhou S Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:3909596.

PMID: 35372568 PMC: 8970886. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3909596.


Chloroplast Genes Are Involved in The Male-Sterility of K-Type CMS in Wheat.

Han Y, Gao Y, Li Y, Zhai X, Zhou H, Ding Q Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(2).

PMID: 35205355 PMC: 8871828. DOI: 10.3390/genes13020310.


References
1.
Morden C, Wolfe K, dePamphilis C, Palmer J . Plastid translation and transcription genes in a non-photosynthetic plant: intact, missing and pseudo genes. EMBO J. 1991; 10(11):3281-8. PMC: 453053. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04892.x. View

2.
Schrubar H, Wanner G, Westhoff P . Transcriptional control of plastid gene expression in greening Sorghum seedlings. Planta. 2013; 183(1):101-11. DOI: 10.1007/BF00197573. View

3.
Ngernprasirtsiri J, Kobayashi H, Akazawa T . DNA Methylation Occurred around Lowly Expressed Genes of Plastid DNA during Tomato Fruit Development. Plant Physiol. 1988; 88(1):16-20. PMC: 1055517. DOI: 10.1104/pp.88.1.16. View

4.
Kobayashi H, Ngernprasirtsiri J, Akazawa T . Transcriptional regulation and DNA methylation in plastids during transitional conversion of chloroplasts to chromoplasts. EMBO J. 1990; 9(2):307-13. PMC: 551667. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08112.x. View

5.
Chen Z, Muthukrishnan S, Liang G, Schertz K, Hart G . A chloroplast DNA deletion located in RNA polymerase gene rpoC2 in CMS lines of sorghum. Mol Gen Genet. 1993; 236(2-3):251-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00277120. View