The On-baseline Latent Inhibition Effect is Not Counterconditioning
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Attention as an acquisition and performance variable (AAPV).
Craddock P, Miller R Learn Behav. 2014; 42(2):105-22.
PMID: 24399700 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0131-9.
References
1.
Killcross A, Dickinson A, Robbins T
. Effects of the neuroleptic alpha-flupenthixol on latent inhibition in aversively- and appetitively-motivated paradigms: evidence for dopamine-reinforcer interactions. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994; 115(1-2):196-205.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02244772.
View
2.
Weiner I
. Neural substrates of latent inhibition: the switching model. Psychol Bull. 1990; 108(3):442-61.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.442.
View
3.
Durlach P, Shane D
. The effect of intertrial food presentations on anticipatory goal-tracking in the rat. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1993; 46(3):289-318.
DOI: 10.1080/14640749308401090.
View
4.
Killcross A, Dickinson A, Robbins T
. Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994; 115(1-2):185-95.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02244771.
View
5.
Killcross A, Robbins T
. Differential effects of intra-accumbens and systemic amphetamine on latent inhibition using an on-baseline, within-subject conditioned suppression paradigm. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993; 110(4):479-89.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02244656.
View