» Articles » PMID: 7862894

Amphetamine-induced Disruptions of Latent Inhibition Are Reinforcer Mediated: Implications for Animal Models of Schizophrenic Attentional Dysfunction

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1994 Jun 1
PMID 7862894
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) is a phenomenon observed when repeated, non-reinforced presentation of a stimulus results in a retardation of subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Several recent experiments have suggested that LI is abolished in conditioned suppression paradigms following acute, low doses of amphetamine given during pre-exposure and conditioning. Experiment 1 sought to increase the generality of this finding in an appetitive LI paradigm, using a dose of amphetamine previously shown to disrupt the LI effect in an aversive paradigm (Killcross and Robbins 1993). However, no evidence for any disruption of LI was found. Experiment 2 extended this investigation to additional, higher doses of d-amphetamine, and also examined the role of reinforcer magnitude in the effect. A non-significant trend towards an attenuated LI effect was found, which was reversed by decreases in the concentration of the sucrose reinforcer. Experiments 3 and 4 investigated the influence of systemic amphetamine in aversive paradigms, with specific attention to the increased response to the aversive foot-shock reinforcer found in amphetamine-treated animals. These experiments revealed that the influence of amphetamine on the LI effect in conditioned suppression paradigms could be reversed by reducing the intensity of footshock used in conditioning, thereby paralleling the effect found in the appetitive paradigm. Therefore it is unlikely that a simple attentional account of the abolition of the LI effect in previous experiments can be sustained.

Citing Articles

Competing contextual processes rely on the infralimbic and prelimbic medial prefrontal cortices in the rat.

George D, Killcross S, Haddon J Oxf Open Neurosci. 2024; 2:kvad003.

PMID: 38596235 PMC: 10913818. DOI: 10.1093/oons/kvad003.


The orbitofrontal cortex is necessary for learning to ignore.

Costa K, Sengupta A, Schoenbaum G Curr Biol. 2021; 31(12):2652-2657.e3.

PMID: 33848459 PMC: 8222097. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.045.


Dopamine-glutamate neuron projections to the nucleus accumbens medial shell and behavioral switching.

Mingote S, Amsellem A, Kempf A, Rayport S, Chuhma N Neurochem Int. 2019; 129:104482.

PMID: 31170424 PMC: 6855309. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104482.


Memory deficits associated with khat (Catha edulis) use in rodents.

Kimani S, Patel N, Kioy P Metab Brain Dis. 2015; 31(1):45-52.

PMID: 26423676 DOI: 10.1007/s11011-015-9738-1.


D-amphetamine and antipsychotic drug effects on latent inhibition in mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors.

Bay-Richter C, OCallaghan M, Mathur N, OTuathaigh C, Heery D, Fone K Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 38(8):1512-20.

PMID: 23422792 PMC: 3682146. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.50.


References
1.
Baruch I, Hemsley D, Gray J . Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988; 176(10):598-606. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198810000-00004. View

2.
Feldon J, Shofel A, Weiner I . Latent inhibition is unaffected by direct dopamine agonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991; 38(2):309-14. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90283-8. View

3.
White N, Milner P . The psychobiology of reinforcers. Annu Rev Psychol. 1992; 43:443-71. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002303. View

4.
Joseph M, Frith C, Waddington J . Dopaminergic mechanisms and cognitive deficit in schizophrenia. A neurobiological model. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979; 63(3):273-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00433561. View

5.
White N, Viaud M . Localized intracaudate dopamine D2 receptor activation during the post-training period improves memory for visual or olfactory conditioned emotional responses in rats. Behav Neural Biol. 1991; 55(3):255-69. DOI: 10.1016/0163-1047(91)90609-t. View