» Articles » PMID: 7298542

The Limits and Motivating Potential of Sensory Stimuli As Reinforcers for Autistic Children

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1981 Jan 1
PMID 7298542
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the reinforcing properties, limits, and motivating potentials of sensory stimuli with autistic children. In the first phase of the study, four intellectually retarded autistic children were exposed to three different types of sensory stimulation (vibration, music, and strobe light) as well as edible and social reinforcers for ten-second intervals contingent upon six simple bar pressing responses. In the second phase, the same events were used as reinforcers for correct responses in learning object labels. The results indicated that: (a) sensory stimuli can be used effectively as reinforcers to maintain high, durable rates of responding in a simple pressing task; (b) ranked preferences for sensory stimuli revealed a unique configuration of responding for each child; and (c) sensory stimuli have motivating potentials comparable to those of the traditional food and social reinforcers even when training receptive language tasks.

Citing Articles

Improved motor skills in autistic children after three weeks of neurologic music therapy via telehealth: a pilot study.

Richard Williams N, Hurt-Thaut C, Brian J, Tremblay L, Pranjic M, Teich J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1355942.

PMID: 38778884 PMC: 11110893. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355942.


Digital Books with Dynamic Text and Speech Output: Effects on Sight Word Reading for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Mandak K, Light J, McNaughton D J Autism Dev Disord. 2018; 49(3):1193-1204.

PMID: 30430319 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3817-1.


Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis.

Tustin R J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(4):597-606.

PMID: 16795840 PMC: 1297846. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597.


Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.

Smith R, Iwata B, Shore B J Appl Behav Anal. 1995; 28(1):61-71.

PMID: 7706151 PMC: 1279786. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-61.


Teacher verbalizations and task performance with autistic children.

Hughes V, Wolery M, Neel R J Autism Dev Disord. 1983; 13(3):305-16.

PMID: 6643375 DOI: 10.1007/BF01531568.


References
1.
HEWETT F . Teaching speech to an autistic child through operant conditioning. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1965; 35(5):927-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1965.tb00472.x. View

2.
Fineman K . Visual-color reinforcement in establishment of speech by an autistic child. Percept Mot Skills. 1968; 26(3):761-2. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1968.26.3.761. View

3.
ANTONITIS J, BARNES G . Group operant behavior: an extension of individual research methodology to a real-life situation. J Genet Psychol. 1961; 98:95-111. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1961.10534357. View

4.
Rincover A, Newsom C, Lovaas O, Koegel R . Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1977; 24(2):312-23. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(77)90009-1. View

5.
HARLOW H, McClearn G . Object discrimination learned by monkeys on the basis of manipulation motives. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954; 47(1):73-6. DOI: 10.1037/h0058241. View