» Articles » PMID: 1890048

Establishing Operations and Reinforcement Effects

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 1890048
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Positive reinforcement procedures have had a major impact on educational programs for the developmentally disabled; nevertheless, variation in reinforcer effectiveness both within and across individuals is a common phenomenon. This study examined one class of variables--establishing operations--that might influence the effectiveness of reinforcers. Five developmentally disabled adult males participated. Responding on one of two motor tasks--switch closure or block placement--was assessed during baseline, satiation, and deprivation conditions with respect to three classes of consequences: small food items, music, and social praise. Deprivation and satiation conditions were constructed so as not to alter significantly the normal course of events in a subject's day. For example, food deprivation entailed scheduling sessions just prior to a subject's regular lunch, and social deprivation involved limiting a subject's access to social interaction for 15 minutes, during which time the subject had access to an assortment of other activities. Results showed that each stimulus class functioned as reinforcement with different degrees of effectiveness during satiation versus deprivation conditions. These results are discussed in light of previous research on enhancement of reinforcer efficacy as well as the assessment and identification of functional reinforcers, and implications are presented for future research and client habilitation.

Citing Articles

The Evolution of the Conceptually Systematic Dimension and Its Current Functions in Applied Behavior Analysis.

Araiba S Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(1):1-27.

PMID: 38660509 PMC: 11035531. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00396-3.


Multiple Schedules Facilitate Rapid Noncontingent Reinforcement Schedule Thinning.

Kelley M, Clark R, McGarry K, Henry J, Morgan A, Gadaire D Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(1):185-193.

PMID: 37006419 PMC: 10050655. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-022-00709-5.


Parents' mHealth App for Promoting Healthy Eating Behaviors in Children: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Pilot Study.

Vazquez-Paz A, Michel-Nava R, Delgado-Perez E, Lares-Michel M, Espinosa-Curiel I J Med Syst. 2022; 46(11):70.

PMID: 36109423 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01860-w.


Resurgence as Choice: Implications for promoting durable behavior change.

Greer B, Shahan T J Appl Behav Anal. 2019; 52(3):816-846.

PMID: 31049954 PMC: 6625346. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.573.


A Review and Treatment Selection Model for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Who Engage in Inappropriate Sexual Behavior.

Davis T, Machalicek W, Scalzo R, Kobylecky A, Campbell V, Pinkelman S Behav Anal Pract. 2016; 9(4):389-402.

PMID: 27920970 PMC: 5118249. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-015-0062-3.


References
1.
Gewirtz J, Baer D . Deprivation and satiation of social reinforcers as drive conditions. J Abnorm Psychol. 1958; 57(2):165-72. DOI: 10.1037/h0042880. View

2.
Gewirtz J, Baer D . The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer. J Abnorm Psychol. 1958; 56(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1037/h0047188. View

3.
Mason S, McGee G, Farmer-Dougan V, Risley T . A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment. J Appl Behav Anal. 1989; 22(2):171-9. PMC: 1286167. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-171. View

4.
Rincover A, Newsom C . The relative motivational properties of sensory and edible reinforcers in teaching autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985; 18(3):237-48. PMC: 1308014. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-237. View

5.
Dattilo J . Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986; 19(4):445-8. PMC: 1308096. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445. View