Evaluation of the Lumac Kit for the Detection of Bacteriuria by Bioluminescence
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Four hundred and twenty-two urine samples were screened for significant bacteriuria using bioluminescence and microscopy of uncentrifuged urine. A smaller number of false-negatives were seen with bioluminescence (10%) than with microscopy (40%) while both techniques gave a similar number of false-positives (18%). The kit required a large amount of manual preparation, largely pipetting. With this and the short shelf-life of the reconstituted reagents, it is not suitable for small numbers of urines. At 45p per urine, the cost of bioluminescence is too high.
Ivancic V, Mastali M, Percy N, Gornbein J, Babbitt J, Li Y J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(4):1213-9.
PMID: 18272708 PMC: 2292911. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02036-07.
Use of an ATP bioluminescent assay to evaluate viability of Pneumocystis carinii from rats.
Chen F, Cushion M J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32(11):2791-800.
PMID: 7852574 PMC: 264161. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2791-2800.1994.
McWalter P, Sharp C Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1982; 1(4):223-7.
PMID: 6756912 DOI: 10.1007/BF02019712.
Comparison of the Lumac and Monolight systems for detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence.
Drow D, Baum C, Hirschfield G J Clin Microbiol. 1984; 20(4):797-801.
PMID: 6490862 PMC: 271433. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.797-801.1984.
Bioluminescence for USP sterility testing of pharmaceutical suspension products.
Bussey D, Tsuji K Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986; 51(2):349-55.
PMID: 3954348 PMC: 238872. DOI: 10.1128/aem.51.2.349-355.1986.