» Articles » PMID: 6976429

Variation of Muscle Stiffness with Tension During Tension Transients and Constant Velocity Shortening in the Frog

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1981 Jan 1
PMID 6976429
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. The length changes of a central segment of a frog muscle fibre were measured during and after a quick shortening was applied to the end of the fibre, by attaching two markers an using a spot follower apparatus. In this way it was shown that the stiffness of tetanized single frog fibres as mounted in our apparatus was located predominantly in the sarcomeres, and that the ends were comparatively stiff. 2. The stiffness of tetanized frog single fibres at 0 degrees was measured by applying a small 4 kHz sinusoidal length change, and measuring the resultant tension change. This was done during the first few milliseconds after a quick release, and while the fibre was shortening at constant velocity. 3. The stiffness during the fast tension transient after a quick release was always less than the stiffness before release, supporting the idea that the fast recovery is not due to attachment of extra cross-bridges. 4. The stiffness during the steady shortening was always less than when isometric. A line fitted to this stiffness-tension plot, when extended, intercepted the stiffness axis at less than half the isometric value. 5. The slope of the stiffness-force plot during the fast tension transient was consistently and significantly less than the slope of the stiffness-force plot during steady shortening, further supporting the conclusion that only a small part of the decrease seen during shortening could be due to non-linear end compliance. 6. Possible ways of reconciling these results with recent reports of X-ray diffraction suggesting little if any change in the position of myosin heads during steady shortening are discussed.

Citing Articles

Effects of shortening velocity on the stiffness to force ratio during isometric force redevelopment suggest mechanisms of residual force depression.

Jeong S, Nishikawa K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):948.

PMID: 36653512 PMC: 9849346. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28236-5.


The Closed State of the Thin Filament Is Not Occupied in Fully Activated Skeletal Muscle.

Bershitsky S, Koubassova N, Ferenczi M, Kopylova G, Narayanan T, Tsaturyan A Biophys J. 2017; 112(7):1455-1461.

PMID: 28402887 PMC: 5389958. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.02.017.


Mechanism of force enhancement during stretching of skeletal muscle fibres investigated by high time-resolved stiffness measurements.

Nocella M, Bagni M, Cecchi G, Colombini B J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2013; 34(1):71-81.

PMID: 23296372 DOI: 10.1007/s10974-012-9335-4.


Mechanism of force enhancement during and after lengthening of active muscle: a temperature dependence study.

Roots H, Pinniger G, Offer G, Ranatunga K J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2012; 33(5):313-25.

PMID: 22706970 DOI: 10.1007/s10974-012-9307-8.


Estrogen and muscle stiffness have a negative relationship in females.

Bell D, Troy Blackburn J, Norcross M, Ondrak K, Hudson J, Hackney A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 20(2):361-7.

PMID: 21695466 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1577-y.


References
1.
Reedy M, Holmes K, Tregear R . Induced changes in orientation of the cross-bridges of glycerinated insect flight muscle. Nature. 1965; 207(5003):1276-80. DOI: 10.1038/2071276a0. View

2.
HUXLEY A . Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957; 7:255-318. View

3.
Gordon A, HUXLEY A, Julian F . The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966; 184(1):170-92. PMC: 1357553. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. View

4.
PODOLSKY R, NOLAN A, Zaveler S . Cross-bridge properties derived from muscle isotonic velocity transients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969; 64(2):504-11. PMC: 223373. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.64.2.504. View

5.
Moore P, Huxley H, DeRosier D . Three-dimensional reconstruction of F-actin, thin filaments and decorated thin filaments. J Mol Biol. 1970; 50(2):279-95. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90192-0. View