» Articles » PMID: 23296372

Mechanism of Force Enhancement During Stretching of Skeletal Muscle Fibres Investigated by High Time-resolved Stiffness Measurements

Overview
Specialties Cell Biology
Physiology
Date 2013 Jan 9
PMID 23296372
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stretching of active muscles leads to a great enhancement of the force developed without increased ATP consumption. The mechanism of force enhancement is still debated and it is not clear if it is due to increased crossbridge strain or to a stretch-induced increase in crossbridge number. The present study, performed on single fibres from tibialis anterior or interosseus muscles of the frog at 5 °C, was aimed at clarifying this point. A striation follower device was used to measure sarcomere length changes. Force was measured during the application of stretches (0.15-3.9 ms duration, 3-7.8 nm per half-sarcomere amplitude) to activated fibres. Small 4 kHz sinusoidal length oscillations, superimposed on the stretches, were used to calculate fibre stiffness with high time resolution. Stiffness increased during the stretch then subsequently decayed, all in parallel with tension. Likewise, during quick releases, stiffness decreased during the release then subsequently recovered in parallel with tension. Comparison of tension and stiffness both during the tetanus rise and also during stretches which doubled tension, imposed on the tetanus rise, indicated that stretch-induced crossbridge recruitment was only about 11 %, suggesting that force enhancement by stretching is mainly due to an increase of individual crossbridge force, whereas crossbridge recruitment plays only a minor role. The accompanying stiffness changes can be explained by non-linearity of myofilament compliance.

Citing Articles

The Transient Mechanics of Muscle Require Only a Single Force-Producing Cross-Bridge State and a 100 Å Working Stroke.

Knupp C, Squire J Biology (Basel). 2020; 9(12).

PMID: 33339405 PMC: 7765809. DOI: 10.3390/biology9120475.


Nonlinear Actomyosin Elasticity in Muscle?.

Mansson A, Persson M, Shalabi N, Rassier D Biophys J. 2019; 116(2):330-346.

PMID: 30606448 PMC: 6350078. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.12.004.


Blebbistatin Effects Expose Hidden Secrets in the Force-Generating Cycle of Actin and Myosin.

Rahman M, Usaj M, Rassier D, Mansson A Biophys J. 2018; 115(2):386-397.

PMID: 30021113 PMC: 6050972. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.05.037.


Do Actomyosin Single-Molecule Mechanics Data Predict Mechanics of Contracting Muscle?.

Mansson A, Usaj M, Moretto L, Rassier D Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(7).

PMID: 29941816 PMC: 6073448. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19071863.


Active shortening protects against stretch-induced force deficits in human skeletal muscle.

Saripalli A, Sugg K, Mendias C, Brooks S, Claflin D J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017; 122(5):1218-1226.

PMID: 28235860 PMC: 5451535. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01054.2016.


References
1.
Edman K . Non-linear myofilament elasticity in frog intact muscle fibres. J Exp Biol. 2009; 212(Pt 8):1115-9. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.020982. View

2.
Colombini B, Benelli G, Nocella M, Musaro A, Cecchi G, Bagni M . Mechanical properties of intact single fibres from wild-type and MLC/mIgf-1 transgenic mouse muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2009; 30(5-6):199-207. DOI: 10.1007/s10974-009-9187-8. View

3.
Bagni M, Cecchi G, Colomo F, Tesi C . Plateau and descending limb of the sarcomere length-tension relation in short length-clamped segments of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1988; 401:581-95. PMC: 1191868. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017181. View

4.
Lombardi V, Piazzesi G . The contractile response during steady lengthening of stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1990; 431:141-71. PMC: 1181768. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018324. View

5.
EDMAN K, Elzinga G, NOBLE M . Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1978; 281:139-55. PMC: 1282688. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012413. View