» Articles » PMID: 6839540

Genetic Control of Eosinophilia. Mouse Strain Variation in Response to Antigens of Parasite Origin

Overview
Date 1983 Feb 1
PMID 6839540
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Strain variation in capacity to develop peripheral blood eosinophilia was observed in inbred NIH and C57BL/10 (B10) mice exposed to parasite antigens by infection or by parenteral injection in Freund's complete adjuvant. NIH mice were good responders, showing rapid development of high eosinophil counts, B10 mice were low responders. The difference in response phenotype was independent of the parasite used for infection (Trichinella spiralis or Nematospiroides dubius) and of the antigen used for injection (T. spiralis larval antigen or Limulus haemocyanin). Pre-treatment of T. spiralis infected mice with low doses of cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) or restriction of the duration of infection to 7 days by anthelmintic treatment did not enhance the response of B10 mice. Thus no evidence was found that the poor response phenotype of B10 during T. spiralis infection reflected any active suppressive mechanisms developed during the adult or muscle larval phases of infection. Demonstration that eosinophilia is induced primarily by the intestinal phase allows comparison with other parameters of the immune response induced by the adult worms, namely intestinal mastocytosis and worm expulsion. From this comparison it is concluded that the low eosinophil response phenotype of B10 mice may reflect a generalized deficiency in the response of bone marrow derived precursor cells to factors of T lymphocyte origin. The significance of genetically determined variation in eosinophil responsiveness is discussed in relation to the development of protective immune or pathological responses to parasite infection.

Citing Articles

Putative SNPs in Ovar-DRB1 and GALNTL6 Genes Conferring Susceptibility to Natural Infection of Haemonchus Contortus in Southern Indian Sheep.

Pratap R, Chennuru S, Krovvidi S, Chitithoti J, Pentala R Acta Parasitol. 2024; 69(1):583-590.

PMID: 38240996 DOI: 10.1007/s11686-023-00778-8.


Between-population differences in constitutive and infection-induced gene expression in threespine stickleback.

Fuess L, Weber J, den Haan S, Steinel N, Shim K, Bolnick D Mol Ecol. 2021; 30(24):6791-6805.

PMID: 34582586 PMC: 8796319. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16197.


Immunity to the model intestinal helminth parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus.

Reynolds L, Filbey K, Maizels R Semin Immunopathol. 2012; 34(6):829-46.

PMID: 23053394 PMC: 3496515. DOI: 10.1007/s00281-012-0347-3.


L3T4-positive T lymphoblasts are responsible for transfer of immunity to Trichinella spiralis in mice.

Grencis R, RIEDLINGER J, Wakelin D Immunology. 1985; 56(2):213-8.

PMID: 3876979 PMC: 1453703.


Genetic control of eosinophilia. Analysis of production and response to eosinophil-differentiating factor in strains of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis.

Lammas D, Mitchell L, Wakelin D Clin Exp Immunol. 1989; 77(1):137-43.

PMID: 2788537 PMC: 1541931.


References
1.
Ogilvie B, Askenase P, Rose M . Basophils and eosinophils in three strains of rats and in athymic (nude) rats following infection with the nematodes Nippostrongylus brasiliensis or Trichinella spiralis. Immunology. 1980; 39(3):385-9. PMC: 1457793. View

2.
Weller P, Goetzl E . The regulatory and effector roles of eosinophils. Adv Immunol. 1979; 27:339-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60264-3. View

3.
Spry C . Alterations in blood eosinophil morphology, binding capacity for complexed IgG and kinetics in patients with tropical (filarial) eosinophilia. Parasite Immunol. 1981; 3(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1981.tb00380.x. View

4.
Wakelin D, Donachie A . Genetic control of immunity to Trichinella spiralis. Donor bone marrow cells determine responses to infection in mouse radiation chimaeras. Immunology. 1981; 43(4):787-92. PMC: 1555082. View

5.
Vadas M . Cyclophosphamide pretreatment induces eosinophilia to nonparasite antigens. J Immunol. 1981; 127(5):2083-6. View