» Articles » PMID: 6237902

The in Vitro and in Vivo Activity of Ciprofloxacin

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1984 Aug 1
PMID 6237902
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867) was compared with those of norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefaclor, sisomicin and cefotaxime in in vitro and mouse protection studies. Approximately 300 clinical isolates of clinically important gram-positive and gram-negative species were used. The median MICs of ciprofloxacin against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria ranged from less than or equal to 0.015-1 mg/l. Ciprofloxacin was 2-8 fold more active than norfloxacin and 100-fold more active than nalidixic acid. It also had a wider spectrum of activity against gram-positive organisms including even enterococci. No cross-resistance was observed between ciprofloxacin and beta-lactam antibiotics or aminoglycosides. Only acidic pH conditions decreased its activity. Ciprofloxacin showed rapid bactericidal action against organisms in both the logarithmic and stationary growth phases. In mouse protection studies (intraperitoneal infection) ciprofloxacin was significantly more effective than norfloxacin, ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and also showed excellent activity against Pseudomonas infections.

Citing Articles

The resistance mechanisms of bacteria against ciprofloxacin and new approaches for enhancing the efficacy of this antibiotic.

Shariati A, Arshadi M, Khosrojerdi M, Abedinzadeh M, Ganjalishahi M, Maleki A Front Public Health. 2023; 10:1025633.

PMID: 36620240 PMC: 9815622. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025633.


Antibacterial Efficacy of Sutures Coated With and Ciprofloxacin: A Comparative Evaluation.

Ravishankar P, Vijayan V, Rao S, Vadivelu S, Narayanaswamy D, Teja S J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019; 11(Suppl 2):S164-S168.

PMID: 31198330 PMC: 6555338. DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_284_18.


 evaluation of local antibiotic delivery via fibrin hydrogel.

Chotitumnavee J, Parakaw T, Srisatjaluk R, Pruksaniyom C, Pisitpipattana S, Thanathipanont C J Dent Sci. 2019; 14(1):7-14.

PMID: 30988874 PMC: 6445976. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.08.010.


Biofilm Formation Protects Salmonella from the Antibiotic Ciprofloxacin In Vitro and In Vivo in the Mouse Model of chronic Carriage.

Gonzalez J, Alberts H, Lee J, Doolittle L, Gunn J Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):222.

PMID: 29317704 PMC: 5760579. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18516-2.


Cecum lymph node dendritic cells harbor slow-growing bacteria phenotypically tolerant to antibiotic treatment.

Kaiser P, Regoes R, Dolowschiak T, Wotzka S, Lengefeld J, Slack E PLoS Biol. 2014; 12(2):e1001793.

PMID: 24558351 PMC: 3928039. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001793.


References
1.
Wise R, Andrews J, Edwards L . In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 23(4):559-64. PMC: 184701. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.23.4.559. View

2.
Bauernfeind A, Petermuller C . In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983; 2(2):111-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02001575. View

3.
Shimizu M, Takase Y, Nakamura S, Katae H, Minami A . Pipemidic acid, a new antibacterial agent active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: in vitro properties. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975; 8(2):132-8. PMC: 429279. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.8.2.132. View

4.
Sato K, Matsuura Y, Inoue M, Une T, Osada Y, Ogawa H . In vitro and in vivo activity of DL-8280, a new oxazine derivative. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982; 22(4):548-53. PMC: 183791. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.22.4.548. View

5.
Ito A, Hirai K, Inoue M, Koga H, SUZUE S, IRIKURA T . In vitro antibacterial activity of AM-715, a new nalidixic acid analog. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 17(2):103-8. PMC: 283741. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.17.2.103. View