» Articles » PMID: 6222896

In Vitro Activity of Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin and Nalidixic Acid

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1983 Apr 1
PMID 6222896
Citations 92
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The in vitro antibacterial activity of the new quinoline derivative ciprofloxacin (BAY 0 9867) was evaluated in comparison to norfloxacin and nalidixic acid using 495 clinical strains of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. The compound was highly active against Enterobacteriaceae, with MICs ranging from 0.008 mg/l to 4 mg/l, whereas the MICs of norfloxacin ranged from 0.03 mg/l to 16 mg/l. All strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus were inhibited with a concentration of 2 mg/l ciprofloxacin and 32 mg/l norfloxacin. Ciprofloxacin was also active against gram-positive cocci. The MICs for Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Streptococcus faecalis ranged from 0.008 to 2.0 mg/l. The activity of ciprofloxacin was only slightly influenced by inoculum size, whereas an acid environment caused a noticeable decrease in the activity. Ciprofloxacin would seem to be a promising antibacterial agent for the treatment of urinary tract infection.

Citing Articles

The antibacterial activity of peptide dendrimers and polymyxin B increases sharply above pH 7.4.

Cai X, Javor S, Gan B, Kohler T, Reymond J Chem Commun (Camb). 2021; 57(46):5654-5657.

PMID: 33972964 PMC: 8186529. DOI: 10.1039/d1cc01838h.


Identification of Novel Antibacterials Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Ivanenkov Y, Zhavoronkov A, Yamidanov R, Osterman I, Sergiev P, Aladinskiy V Front Pharmacol. 2019; 10:913.

PMID: 31507413 PMC: 6719509. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00913.


Compatibility of ciprofloxacin with commercial peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Kussmann M, Ferth A, Obermuller M, Pichler P, Zeitlinger M, Wiesholzer M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):6512.

PMID: 31019280 PMC: 6482149. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42854-y.


Influence of different peritoneal dialysis fluids on the in vitro activity of fosfomycin against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Kussmann M, Hauer S, Pichler P, Reznicek G, Burgmann H, Poeppl W Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018; 37(6):1091-1098.

PMID: 29546637 PMC: 5948293. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3221-y.


Detection of Ciprofloxacin in Urine through Sensitized Lanthanide Luminescence.

Singha S, Ahn K Sensors (Basel). 2016; 16(12).

PMID: 27929396 PMC: 5191046. DOI: 10.3390/s16122065.


References
1.
Kershaw M, Leigh D . The antibacterial and pharmacological activity of oxolinic acid (Prodoxol). J Antimicrob Chemother. 1975; 1(3):311-5. DOI: 10.1093/jac/1.3.311. View

2.
LESHER G, FROELICH E, GRUETT M, Bailey J, BRUNDAGE R . 1,8-NAPHTHYRIDINE DERIVATIVES. A NEW CLASS OF CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS. J Med Pharm Chem. 1962; 5:1063-5. DOI: 10.1021/jm01240a021. View

3.
Soussy C, Thibault M, Kitzis M, Acar J, Duval J, CHABBERT Y . [Comparative study of six quinolone antibacterials (author's transl)]. Ann Microbiol (Paris). 1977; 128B(1):19-33. View

4.
Giamarellou H, JACKSON G . Antibacterial activity of cinoxacin in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975; 7(5):688-92. PMC: 429204. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.7.5.688. View

5.
Norrby S, Jonsson M . Antibacterial activity of norfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 23(1):15-8. PMC: 184607. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.23.1.15. View