Cone I, Clopath C, Shouval H
Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5856.
PMID: 38997276
PMC: 11245539.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50205-3.
Marquez I, Loewinger G, Vargas J, Lopez J, Diaz E, Esber G
Behav Neurosci. 2022; 136(4):285-292.
PMID: 35175064
PMC: 9396881.
DOI: 10.1037/bne0000505.
Kutlu M, Zachry J, Melugin P, Cajigas S, Chevee M, Kelly S
Curr Biol. 2021; 31(21):4748-4761.e8.
PMID: 34529938
PMC: 9084920.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.052.
Liu W, Livesey E, Lachnit H, Don H, Thorwart A
PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0243434.
PMID: 33338047
PMC: 7748133.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243434.
Christiansen I, Schausberger P
Anim Behav. 2017; 133:21-28.
PMID: 29104298
PMC: 5663340.
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.09.005.
Context modulation of learned attention deployment.
Uengoer M, Pearce J, Lachnit H, Koenig S
Learn Behav. 2017; 46(1):23-37.
PMID: 28597217
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-017-0277-y.
Selectivity in associative learning: a cognitive stage framework for blocking and cue competition phenomena.
Boddez Y, Haesen K, Baeyens F, Beckers T
Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1305.
PMID: 25429280
PMC: 4228836.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01305.
Attention as an acquisition and performance variable (AAPV).
Craddock P, Miller R
Learn Behav. 2014; 42(2):105-22.
PMID: 24399700
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0131-9.
Evidence that blocking is due to associative deficit: Blocking history affects the degree of subsequent associative competition.
Williams B
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 3(1):71-4.
PMID: 24214804
DOI: 10.3758/BF03210742.
Modeling attention in associative learning: two processes or one?.
Le Pelley M, Haselgrove M, Esber G
Learn Behav. 2012; 40(3):292-304.
PMID: 22927002
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-012-0084-4.
Knowledge as process: contextually-cued attention and early word learning.
Smith L, Colunga E, Yoshida H
Cogn Sci. 2010; 34(7):1287-314.
PMID: 21116438
PMC: 2992382.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01130.x.
Opioid regulation of Pavlovian overshadowing in fear conditioning.
Zelikowsky M, Fanselow M
Behav Neurosci. 2010; 124(4):510-9.
PMID: 20695650
PMC: 2921234.
DOI: 10.1037/a0020083.
Learned predictiveness effects following single-cue training in humans.
Le Pelley M, Turnbull M, Reimers S, Knipe R
Learn Behav. 2010; 38(2):126-44.
PMID: 20400733
DOI: 10.3758/LB.38.2.126.
Structural selection in implicit learning of artificial grammars.
van den Bos E, Poletiek F
Psychol Res. 2009; 74(2):138-51.
PMID: 19212781
PMC: 2808520.
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0227-1.
Attentional changes in blocking are not a consequence of lateral inhibition.
Griffiths O, Le Pelley M
Learn Behav. 2009; 37(1):27-41.
PMID: 19122051
DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.1.27.
Variations in unconditioned stimulus processing in unblocking.
Holland P, Kenmuir C
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005; 31(2):155-71.
PMID: 15839773
PMC: 1201525.
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.155.
Blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning is not due to learned inattention: indirect support for an error correction mechanism of blocking.
Allen M, Padilla Y, Gluck M
Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 2003; 37(4):254-64.
PMID: 12645843
DOI: 10.1007/BF02734248.
Selective hippocampal lesions disrupt a novel cue effect but fail to eliminate blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning.
Allen M, Padilla Y, Myers C, Gluck M
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003; 2(4):318-28.
PMID: 12641176
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.2.4.318.
Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention.
Kruschke J, Blair N
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001; 7(4):636-45.
PMID: 11206204
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213001.
Blocking and nonsimultaneous compounds: comparison of responding during compound conditioning and testing.
Gaioni S
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1982; 17(1):16-29.
PMID: 7099730
DOI: 10.1007/BF03003472.
