» Articles » PMID: 19212781

Structural Selection in Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2009 Feb 13
PMID 19212781
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the contextual cueing paradigm, Endo and Takeda (in Percept Psychophys 66:293-302, 2004) provided evidence that implicit learning involves selection of the aspect of a structure that is most useful to one's task. The present study attempted to replicate this finding in artificial grammar learning to investigate whether or not implicit learning commonly involves such a selection. Participants in Experiment 1 were presented with an induction task that could be facilitated by several characteristics of the exemplars. For some participants, those characteristics included a perfectly predictive feature. The results suggested that the aspect of the structure that was most useful to the induction task was selected and learned implicitly. Experiment 2 provided evidence that, although salience affected participants' awareness of the perfectly predictive feature, selection for implicit learning was mainly based on usefulness.

Citing Articles

Language play facilitates language learning: Optimizing the input for gender-like category induction.

Bebout J, Belke E Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017; 2(1):11.

PMID: 28275704 PMC: 5318489. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-016-0038-z.


Learning simple and complex artificial grammars in the presence of a semantic reference field: effects on performance and awareness.

van den Bos E, Poletiek F Front Psychol. 2015; 6:158.

PMID: 25745408 PMC: 4333800. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00158.


Who learns more? Cultural differences in implicit sequence learning.

Fu Q, Dienes Z, Shang J, Fu X PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e71625.

PMID: 23940773 PMC: 3737123. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071625.


Here today, gone tomorrow--adaptation to change in memory-guided visual search.

Zellin M, Conci M, von Muhlenen A, Muller H PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59466.

PMID: 23555038 PMC: 3598746. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059466.

References
1.
Dienes Z, Perner J . A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 22(5):735-55; discussion 755-808. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x99002186. View

2.
Jimenez L, Mendez C . Implicit sequence learning with competing explicit cues. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001; 54(2):345-69. DOI: 10.1080/713755964. View

3.
Howard Jr J, Howard D, Dennis N, Yankovich H, Vaidya C . Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. Neuropsychology. 2004; 18(1):124-34. PMC: 1224740. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.124. View

4.
Wright R, Whittlesea B . Implicit learning of complex structures: active adaptation and selective processing in acquisition and application. Mem Cognit. 1998; 26(2):402-20. DOI: 10.3758/bf03201149. View

5.
Chun M, Jiang Y . Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn Psychol. 1998; 36(1):28-71. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681. View