» Articles » PMID: 11206204

Blocking and Backward Blocking Involve Learned Inattention

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2001 Feb 24
PMID 11206204
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Four experiments examine blocking of associative learning by human participants in a disease diagnosis procedure. The results indicate that after a cue is blocked, subsequent learning about the cue is attenuated. This attenuated learning after blocking is obtained for both standard blocking and for backward blocking. Attenuated learning after blocking cannot be accounted for by theories such as the Rescorla-Wagner model that rely on lack of learning about a redundant cue, nor can it be accounted for by extensions of the Rescorla-Wagner model designed to address backward blocking that encode absent cues with negative values. The results are predicted by the hypothesis that people learn not to attend to the blocked cue.

Citing Articles

Forward and backward blocking in statistical learning.

Nazli I, Ferrari A, Huber-Huber C, de Lange F PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0306797.

PMID: 39102398 PMC: 11299817. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306797.


A Statistical Foundation for Derived Attention.

Paskewitz S, Jones M J Math Psychol. 2023; 112.

PMID: 36909347 PMC: 10004174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102728.


The benefits of immature cognitive control: How distributed attention guards against learning traps.

Blanco N, Turner B, Sloutsky V J Exp Child Psychol. 2022; 226:105548.

PMID: 36126587 PMC: 10300511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105548.


Thinking Structurally: A Cognitive Framework for Understanding How People Attribute Inequality to Structural Causes.

Amemiya J, Mortenson E, Heyman G, Walker C Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022; 18(2):259-274.

PMID: 35981099 PMC: 9938098. DOI: 10.1177/17456916221093593.


Dissecting EXIT.

Paskewitz S, Jones M J Math Psychol. 2022; 97.

PMID: 35571864 PMC: 9098183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102371.


References
1.
Kruschke J . ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(1):22-44. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.22. View

2.
Kruschke J . Base rates in category learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996; 22(1):3-26. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.1.3. View

3.
Hinchy J, Lovibond P . Blocking in human electrodermal conditioning. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1995; 48(1):2-12. View

4.
Pearce J . Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. Psychol Rev. 1994; 101(4):587-607. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.587. View

5.
Chapman G, Robbins S . Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Mem Cognit. 1990; 18(5):537-45. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198486. View