» Articles » PMID: 512570

Signal Probability, Reinforcement and Signal Detection

Overview
Date 1979 Nov 1
PMID 512570
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Five pigeons were trained to detect differences in light intensity. Two stimuli, S1 and S2, differing in intensity, were arranged on the center key of a three-key chamber according to set probabilities. A peck on the center key turned on the two side keys. When S1 was presented on the center key, a peck on the left key was "correct" and when S2 was presented, a peck on the right key was "correct." Correct responses produced reinforcement and incorrect responses produced 3-second blackout. Detection performance was measured under three procedures. The first was a standard signal-detection design in which the probability of S1 was varied and the number of reinforcements obtained for correct responses to S1 was allowed to covary. In the second procedure, the probability of S1 was again varied but the distribution of reinforcements between the two choices was kept equal. In the third procedure, probability of S1 was held constant while the distribution of reinforcements was varied between the two choices. Changes in response bias were a function of variations in the relative reinforcement ratio for the choice responses and not a function of variations in the probability of stimulus presentation. Discriminability remained constant across the three procedures.

Citing Articles

Validation of a touchscreen probabilistic reward task for mice: A reverse-translated assay with cross-species continuity.

Luc O, Kangas B Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023; 24(2):281-288.

PMID: 37770642 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01128-x.


Mood Symptom Dimensions and Developmental Differences in Neurocognition in Adolescence.

Kaiser R, Moser A, Neilson C, Peterson E, Jones J, Hough C Clin Psychol Sci. 2023; 11(2):308-325.

PMID: 37309523 PMC: 10259862. DOI: 10.1177/21677026221111389.


Pre-frontal stimulation does not reliably increase reward responsiveness.

Hadden L, Penny H, Jones A, Partridge A, Lancaster T, Allen C Cortex. 2023; 159:268-285.

PMID: 36669446 PMC: 10823575. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.11.011.


Electrophysiological signatures of reward learning in the rodent touchscreen-based Probabilistic Reward Task.

Iturra-Mena A, Kangas B, Luc O, Potter D, Pizzagalli D Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023; 48(4):700-709.

PMID: 36646816 PMC: 9938210. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01532-4.


Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning and Anhedonia.

Kangas B, Der-Avakian A, Pizzagalli D Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2022; 58():355-377.

PMID: 35435644 PMC: 11708784. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2022_349.


References
1.
Hume A, Irwin R . Bias functions and operating characteristics of rats discriminating auditory stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 21(2):285-95. PMC: 1333196. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-285. View

2.
Shimp C . Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966; 9(4):443-55. PMC: 1338246. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443. View

3.
Stubbs D, Pliskoff S . Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(6):887-95. PMC: 1338698. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887. View

4.
Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

5.
Todorov J . Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 19(3):451-8. PMC: 1334140. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-451. View