» Articles » PMID: 4205654

Bias Functions and Operating Characteristics of Rats Discriminating Auditory Stimuli

Overview
Date 1974 Mar 1
PMID 4205654
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rats were trained to discriminate between two bursts of random noise that differed in intensity. In a two-lever, discrete-trial procedure, correct responses were reinforced with brain stimulation, and incorrect responses produced timeout. Responding was studied as a function of the decibel difference between the stimuli, the probabilities of presenting the stimuli, the relative duration of timeout consequent upon the two types of incorrect responses, and the absolute duration of timeout consequent upon incorrect responses. The results showed that the distribution of responses between the two levers depended upon the stimulus probabilities, but were independent of either the absolute or relative durations of timeout. When the stimulus probabilities were varied, the response probabilities did not match the stimulus probabilities; when the relative durations of timeout were varied, the animals did not obtain the maximum rate of reinforcement per unit time. Instead, the animals distributed their responses so as to obtain the maximum number of reinforcements at each level of discrimination. In addition, the level of discrimination increased as a function of the decibel difference between the stimuli.

Citing Articles

Stimulus disparity and punisher control of human signal-detection performance.

Lie C, Alsop B J Exp Anal Behav. 2010; 93(2):185-201.

PMID: 20885810 PMC: 2832343. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-185.


Effects of point-loss punishers on human signal-detection performance.

Lie C, Alsop B J Exp Anal Behav. 2010; 92(1):17-39.

PMID: 20119520 PMC: 2707137. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-17.


Stimulus control and response bias in an analogue prey-detection procedure.

Voss P, McCarthy D, Davison M J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 60(2):387-413.

PMID: 16812703 PMC: 1322183. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-387.


Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure.

Davison M, McCarthy D J Exp Anal Behav. 1980; 34(1):35-47.

PMID: 16812178 PMC: 1332943. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-35.


Discriminability of fixed-ratio schedules for pigeons: effects of payoff values.

Hobson S J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 30(1):69-81.

PMID: 16812090 PMC: 1332734. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-69.


References
1.
Zimmerman J, BAYDAN N . PUNISHMENT OF S-DELTA RESPONDING OF HUMANS IN CONDITIONAL MATCHING TO SAMPLE BY TIME-OUT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:589-97. PMC: 1404429. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-589. View

2.
HOLZ W, Azrin N, Ulrich R . Punishment of temporally spaced responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:115-22. PMC: 1404223. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-115. View

3.
HOLZ W, Azrin N . A comparison of several procedures for eliminating behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:399-406. PMC: 1404446. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-399. View

4.
Zimmerman J, Ferster C . Intermittent punishment of Sdelta responding in matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:349-56. PMC: 1404455. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-349. View

5.
HACK M . Signal detection in the rat. Science. 1963; 139(3556):758-60. DOI: 10.1126/science.139.3556.758. View