Probabilistically Reinforced Choice Behavior in Pigeons
Overview
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
A single principle, "momentary maximizing", may account for much of a pigeon's steady-state behavior in both probability learning and concurrent variable interval experiments. The principle states that a pigeon tends to choose the alternative that momentarily has the higher probability of reinforcement. A successive discrimination procedure, which produced matching in an earlier experiment, produced here a tendency to maximize if training were adequately extended. Maximizing was produced also by other procedures, in which no reinforcing event was presented on some trials: one procedure did and two did not provide a bird with information about the availability of reinforcement on a key after an unreinforced response on the other key. The latter two procedures were analogous to concurrent variable interval schedules in two respects: the reinforcement probability on one key increased while a bird responded on the other key; and they produced matching. But sequential statistics suggested that matching resulted from momentary maximizing. Depending on the procedure, the tendency to maximize produced different relative frequencies of pecking a key for a fixed relative frequency of reinforcement. Computer simulation of maximizing behavior in several concurrent variable interval schedules produced matching and sequential statistics similar to those produced by a real bird.
The active time model of concurrent choice.
Cleaveland J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0301173.
PMID: 38771859 PMC: 11108226. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301173.
Rat movements reflect internal decision dynamics in an evidence accumulation task.
Kane G, Senne R, Scott B bioRxiv. 2023; .
PMID: 37745309 PMC: 10515875. DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.11.556575.
Undermatching Is a Consequence of Policy Compression.
Bari B, Gershman S J Neurosci. 2023; 43(3):447-457.
PMID: 36639891 PMC: 9864556. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1003-22.2022.
Hachiga Y, Schwartz L, Tripoli C, Michaels S, Kearns D, Silberberg A J Comp Psychol. 2018; 133(2):197-206.
PMID: 30372107 PMC: 6488457. DOI: 10.1037/com0000144.
Pitts R Behav Anal. 2016; 36(2):313-323.
PMID: 28018042 PMC: 5147446. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392317.