» Articles » PMID: 5961513

Probabilistically Reinforced Choice Behavior in Pigeons

Overview
Date 1966 Jul 1
PMID 5961513
Citations 87
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A single principle, "momentary maximizing", may account for much of a pigeon's steady-state behavior in both probability learning and concurrent variable interval experiments. The principle states that a pigeon tends to choose the alternative that momentarily has the higher probability of reinforcement. A successive discrimination procedure, which produced matching in an earlier experiment, produced here a tendency to maximize if training were adequately extended. Maximizing was produced also by other procedures, in which no reinforcing event was presented on some trials: one procedure did and two did not provide a bird with information about the availability of reinforcement on a key after an unreinforced response on the other key. The latter two procedures were analogous to concurrent variable interval schedules in two respects: the reinforcement probability on one key increased while a bird responded on the other key; and they produced matching. But sequential statistics suggested that matching resulted from momentary maximizing. Depending on the procedure, the tendency to maximize produced different relative frequencies of pecking a key for a fixed relative frequency of reinforcement. Computer simulation of maximizing behavior in several concurrent variable interval schedules produced matching and sequential statistics similar to those produced by a real bird.

Citing Articles

The active time model of concurrent choice.

Cleaveland J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0301173.

PMID: 38771859 PMC: 11108226. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301173.


Rat movements reflect internal decision dynamics in an evidence accumulation task.

Kane G, Senne R, Scott B bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37745309 PMC: 10515875. DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.11.556575.


Undermatching Is a Consequence of Policy Compression.

Bari B, Gershman S J Neurosci. 2023; 43(3):447-457.

PMID: 36639891 PMC: 9864556. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1003-22.2022.


Like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), pigeons (Columba livia domestica) match and Nash equilibrate where humans (Homo sapiens) do not.

Hachiga Y, Schwartz L, Tripoli C, Michaels S, Kearns D, Silberberg A J Comp Psychol. 2018; 133(2):197-206.

PMID: 30372107 PMC: 6488457. DOI: 10.1037/com0000144.


On Multiscaled and Unified.

Pitts R Behav Anal. 2016; 36(2):313-323.

PMID: 28018042 PMC: 5147446. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392317.


References
1.
Herrnstein R . SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964; 7:27-36. PMC: 1404366. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27. View

2.
Reynolds G . Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:179-84. PMC: 1404046. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-179. View

3.
Reynolds G . On some determinants of choice in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:53-9. PMC: 1404237. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-53. View

4.
Bullock D, Bitterman M . Probability-matching in the pigeon. Am J Psychol. 1962; 75:634-9. View

5.
Graf V, Bullock D, Bitterman M . FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964; 7:151-7. PMC: 1404312. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-151. View