Quantitative Determination of Amplified RDNA and Its Distribution During Oogenesis in Xenopus Laevis

Overview

Journal Chromosoma

Specialty Molecular Biology

Date 1979 Jun 21

PMID 487908

Citations 8

Authors

C H Thiebaud

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The number of extra-chromosomal nucleoli and their rDNA content were determined during oogenesis in Xenopus laevis. The highly variable number of nucleoli (500 to 2,500) in oocytes of the same stage and from the same female or of different stages or from different females is not a measure of the extent of amplification. In all oocytes examined, a inversely proportional relation was found between the number of nucleoli in an oocyte and their mean rDNA content. These results indicate that there is no variation of the rDNA content of oocytes during oogenesis nor between oocytes of different females. The varying nucleolar numbers found in oocytes result thus from fusion and fission of pre-existing nucleoli. The determination of the rDNA content, in absolute units (35 pg), after amplification which occurs at the beginning of oogenesis, makes it possible to calculate the rDNA content of one nucleolus. This ranged from 0.7.10(-2) pg to 15.10(-2) pg, corresponding to about 500--11,000 cistrons of rDNA. No distinct size classes between these two extremes were observed.

Citing Articles

Nucleolar dominance and maternal control of 45S rDNA expression.

Michalak K, Maciak S, Kim Y, Santopietro G, Oh J, Kang L Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1820):20152201.

PMID: 26645200 PMC: 4685780. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2201.

Evidence for maternal imprinting of 45S ribosomal RNA genes in Xenopus hybrids.

Michalak P Dev Genes Evol. 2014; 224(2):125-8.

PMID: 24477594 DOI: 10.1007/s00427-014-0464-1.

Synthesis of pre-rRNA and mRNA is directed to a chromatin-poor compartment in the macronucleus of the spirotrichous ciliate Stylonychia lemnae.

Postberg J, Alexandrova O, Lipps H Chromosome Res. 2006; 14(2):161-75.

PMID: 16544190 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-006-1033-x.

Chromosome banding in amphibia. IV. Differentiation of GC- and AT-rich chromosome regions in Anura.

Schmid M Chromosoma. 1980; 77(1):83-103.

PMID: 7371452 DOI: 10.1007/BF00292043.

Chromosome banding in Amphibia. VIII. An unusual XY/XX-sex chromosome system in Gastrotheca riobambae (Anura, Hylidae).

Schmid M, Haaf T, Geile B, Sims S Chromosoma. 1983; 88(1):69-82.

PMID: 6192977 DOI: 10.1007/BF00329505.

References

Bird A, Birnstiel M . A timing study of DNA amplification in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Chromosoma. 1971; 35(3):300-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00326280. View

Brown D, Weber C . Gene linkage by RNA-DNA hybridization. II. Arrangement of the redundant gene sequences for 28 s and 18 s ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol. 1968; 34(3):681-97. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90189-7. View

Kalt M, Gall J . Observations on early germ cell development and premeiotic ribosomal DNA amplification in Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1974; 62(2):460-72. PMC: 2109412. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.62.2.460. View

Thiebaud C . The intra-nucleolar localization of amplified rDNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Chromosoma. 1979; 73(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1007/BF00294841. View

Dumont J . Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972; 136(2):153-79. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. View

Brown D, Wensink P, Jordan E . A comparison of the ribosomal DNA's of Xenopus laevis and Xenopus mulleri: the evolution of tandem genes. J Mol Biol. 1972; 63(1):57-73. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90521-9. View

Perkowska E, MACGREGOR H, Birnstiel M . Gene amplification in the oocyte nucleus of mutant and wild-type Xenopus laevis. Nature. 1968; 217(5129):649-50. DOI: 10.1038/217649a0. View

Brown D, Dawid I . Specific gene amplification in oocytes. Oocyte nuclei contain extrachromosomal replicas of the genes for ribosomal RNA. Science. 1968; 160(3825):272-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.160.3825.272. View

Thiebaud C, FISCHBERG M . DNA content in the genus Xenopus. Chromosoma. 1977; 59(3):253-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00292781. View

10.

Wellauer P, Dawid I . Secondary structure maps of ribosomal RNA and DNA. I. Processing of Xenopus laevis ribosomal RNA and structure of single-stranded ribosomal DNA. J Mol Biol. 1974; 89(2):379-95. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90526-9. View

11.

Evans D, Birnstiel M . Localization of amplified ribosomal DNA in the oocyte of Xenopus laevis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968; 166(1):274-6. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(68)90517-0. View

12.

Hourcade D, Dressler D, Wolfson J . The amplification of ribosomal RNA genes involves a rolling circle intermediate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973; 70(10):2926-30. PMC: 427140. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.70.10.2926. View

13.

Wellauer P, Reeder R, Carroll D, Brown D, Deutch A, Higashinakagawa T . Amplified ribosomal DNA from Xenopus laevis has heterogeneous spacer lengths. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974; 71(7):2823-7. PMC: 388564. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2823. View

14.

BUONGIORNO-NARDELLI M, Amaldi F . Amplification as a rectification mechanism for the redundant rRNA genes. Nat New Biol. 1972; 238(83):134-7. DOI: 10.1038/newbio238134a0. View

15.

Wensink P, Brown D . Denaturation map of the ribosomal DNA of Xenopus laevis. J Mol Biol. 1971; 60(2):235-47. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90290-7. View

16.

Gall J . The genes for ribosomal RNA during oögenesis. Genetics. 1969; 61(1):Suppl:121-32. View

17.

Coggins L, Gall J . The timing of meiosis and DNA synthesis during early oogenesis in the toad, Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1972; 52(3):569-76. PMC: 2108647. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.52.3.569. View

18.

Rochaix J, Bird A, Barkken A . Ribosomal RNA gene amplification by rolling circles. J Mol Biol. 1974; 87(3):473-87. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90098-9. View