» Articles » PMID: 4426916

Observations on Early Germ Cell Development and Premeiotic Ribosomal DNA Amplification in Xenopus Laevis

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1974 Aug 1
PMID 4426916
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The origin of premeiotic ribosomal DNA (rDNA) amplification in germ-line cells of Xenopus laevis has been examined using in situ RNA-DNA hybridization on cytological preparations, tritiated thymidine autoradiography, and isopycnic density gradient centrifugation. Primordial germ cells (PGC), from the time they first become localized in the genital ridge at day no. 4 of development, until approximately day no. 22, remain in an extended interphase condition. During this time PGC do not incorporate tritiated thymidine, have near diploid levels of rDNA as demonstrated by cytological RNA-DNA hybridization, and possess only one or two nucleoli. Starting on day no. 22-24, mitosis, sexual differentiation, and rDNA gene amplification all begin in the germ cells. Multiple nucleoli also make their appearance at this stage. Ribosomal DNA amplification continues in gonial cells as long as they remain mitotically active. Amplified copies of rDNA are lost from germ cells at the onset of meiotic prophase. This loss is probably permanent in the male germ line, but variable and temporary in the female germ line. Early gonial cells in the ovary have been deduced to have an average cycle time for each mitotic division of between 3.8 and 4.3 days at a temperature of 21 degrees C. Some oogonia appear to divide only four times before entering meiotic prophase, while the average during the initial wave of germ cell division is nine. Finally, a satellite DNA has been isolated from adult testes which has a density in neutral cesium chloride corresponding to the density of amplified oocyte rDNA. This satellite is not present in DNA isolated from somatic tissues of Xenopus.

Citing Articles

BRCA1-A and LIG4 complexes mediate ecDNA biogenesis and cancer drug resistance.

Chung O, Yao S, Yang F, Wang L, Cerda-Smith C, Hutchinson H bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027615 PMC: 11870461. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.18.638901.


Intragenomic rDNA variation - the product of concerted evolution, mutation, or something in between?.

Wang W, Zhang X, Garcia S, Leitch A, Kovarik A Heredity (Edinb). 2023; 131(3):179-188.

PMID: 37402824 PMC: 10462631. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-023-00634-5.


Repression of G1/S Transition by Transient Inhibition of miR-10404 Expression in Drosophila Primordial Germ Cells.

Morita S, Ota R, Hayashi M, Kobayashi S iScience. 2020; 23(3):100950.

PMID: 32179474 PMC: 7075979. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100950.


Amplified ribosomal DNA in meiotic prophase oocyte nuclei of acipenserid fishes.

Raikova E, Steinert G, Thomas C Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol. 2017; 186(1):81-85.

PMID: 28305315 DOI: 10.1007/BF00848111.


Meiosis I in Xenopus oocytes is not error-prone despite lacking spindle assembly checkpoint.

Liu D, Shao H, Wang H, Liu X Cell Cycle. 2014; 13(10):1602-6.

PMID: 24646611 PMC: 4050165. DOI: 10.4161/cc.28562.


References
1.
Wallace H, Birnstiel M . Ribosomal cistrons and the nucleolar organizer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966; 114(2):296-310. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(66)90311-x. View

2.
FLAMM W, McCallum M, Walker P . The isolation of complementary strands from a mouse DNA fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967; 57(6):1729-34. PMC: 224539. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.57.6.1729. View

3.
Brown D, Dawid I . Specific gene amplification in oocytes. Oocyte nuclei contain extrachromosomal replicas of the genes for ribosomal RNA. Science. 1968; 160(3825):272-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.160.3825.272. View

4.
BIRNSTIEL M, Speirs J, PURDOM I, Jones K, Loening U . Properties and composition of the isolated ribosomal DNA satellite of Xenopus laevis. Nature. 1968; 219(5153):454-63. DOI: 10.1038/219454a0. View

5.
Gall J . Differential synthesis of the genes for ribosomal RNA during amphibian oögenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968; 60(2):553-60. PMC: 225083. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.60.2.553. View