» Articles » PMID: 4540958

Influence of Transepithelial Potential Difference on the Sodium Uptake at the Outer Surface of the Isolated Frog Skin

Overview
Journal J Gen Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1973 May 1
PMID 4540958
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The unidirectional uptake of sodium across the outer surface of the isolated frog skin (J(12) (Na)) was measured in the presence of transepithelial potential difference (Delta(psi)) ranging from +100 to -100 mV. With a sodium concentration of 115 mM in the bathing solutions J(12) (Na) increases significantly when the spontaneous Delta(psi) is reduced to zero by short-circuiting the skin. With an Na concentration of 6 mM a progressive increase J(12) (Na) can be observed when Delta(psi) is decreased in several steps from +100 to -100 mV (serosal side positive and negative, respectively). The observed change J(12) (Na) amounts to a fraction only of that predicted from the shift in Delta(psi). The results suggest that under open circuit conditions the potential step across the outside surface is at most one half of Delta(psi) and that the resistance across the outside and inside barrier of the skin is ohmic. This is in agreement with measurements of intracellular potentials in the frog skin and with resistance measurements carried out in the toad skin. The data strongly support the view that the saturating component of J(psi) proceeds via a charged carrier system. Exposure to negative values of Delta(psi) of 50 mV or more for times of 24 min or more result in a marked reduction of J(12) (Na) which shows only partial or no reversibility.

Citing Articles

Electrotaxis of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in a multiple-electric-field chip with uniform flow field.

Tsai H, Peng S, Wu C, Chang H, Cheng J Biomicrofluidics. 2013; 6(3):34116.

PMID: 24009650 PMC: 3448594. DOI: 10.1063/1.4749826.


Synchronization modulation increases transepithelial potentials in MDCK monolayers through Na/K pumps.

Tran V, Zhang X, Cao L, Li H, Lee B, So M PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61509.

PMID: 23585907 PMC: 3621860. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061509.


Surface potentials and sodium entry in frog skin epithelium.

Benos D, Latorre R, Reyes J J Physiol. 1981; 321:163-74.

PMID: 6978394 PMC: 1249619. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013977.


Action of caerulein, gastrin 17, pentagastrin, and secretin on the active transport of sodium by the frog skin.

Greenwell J, Low H J Membr Biol. 1981; 61(2):91-6.

PMID: 6974244 DOI: 10.1007/BF02007635.


Effect of FeCl3 on ion transport in isolated frog skin.

Biber T, Mullen T, DeSimone J J Membr Biol. 1980; 52(2):133-9.

PMID: 6965989 DOI: 10.1007/BF01869118.


References
1.
Biber T, Chez R, Curran P . Na transport across frog skin at low external Na concentrations. J Gen Physiol. 1966; 49(6):1161-76. PMC: 3328320. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.0491161. View

2.
Schultz S, Curran P, Chez R, FUISZ R . Alanine and sodium fluxes across mucosal border of rabbit ileum. J Gen Physiol. 1967; 50(5):1241-60. PMC: 2225716. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.50.5.1241. View

3.
Lindemann B, Thorns U . Fast potential spike of frog skin generated at the outer surface of the epithelium. Science. 1967; 158(3807):1473-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.158.3807.1473. View

4.
Dobson Jr J, KIDDER 3rd G . Edge damage effect in in vitro frog skin preparations. Am J Physiol. 1968; 214(4):719-24. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1968.214.4.719. View

5.
VOUTE C, USSING H . Some morphological aspects of active sodium transport. The epithelium of the frog skin. J Cell Biol. 1968; 36(3):625-38. PMC: 2107371. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.36.3.625. View