» Articles » PMID: 34150456

The Use of Demand Assessments: A Brief Review and Practical Guide

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 Jun 21
PMID 34150456
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is important for practitioners to first conduct an indirect demand assessment to identify appropriate stimuli to include during the direct demand assessment. Information obtained from an indirect demand assessment is useful not only for identifying which demands to evaluate during the direct assessment but also for selecting stimuli associated with each demand. Conducting an indirect demand assessment with caregivers provides practitioners the opportunity to identify whether specific demand stimuli are associated with more challenging behavior (e.g., writing with a pen vs. a pencil) and whether demand presentation may be an establishing operation for challenging behavior (e.g., presenting one math problem at a time vs. presenting an entire math worksheet). The purpose of this article is to review the current literature on demand assessment procedures and to provide practitioners with a practical guide for conducting demand assessments in clinical settings. We provide a summary of our findings along with a brief description of the procedures used for implementing the indirect and direct demand assessments. Further, we created a decision-making guide to help practitioners select which type of demand assessment to conduct with their clients.

Citing Articles

Cortical Vision Impairment (CVI)-informed assessment and treatment of challenging behavior in a child with SCN2A-related disorder.

Thomas B, Ludwig N, Pelletier D, Bauer M, Hommer R, Smith-Hicks C J Neurodev Disord. 2024; 16(1):66.

PMID: 39609790 PMC: 11603671. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-024-09580-7.

References
1.
Roscoe E, Rooker G, Pence S, Longworth L . Assessing the utility of a demand assessment for functional analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010; 42(4):819-25. PMC: 2790938. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-819. View

2.
McClintock K, Hall S, Oliver C . Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analytic study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003; 47(Pt 6):405-16. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x. View

3.
Wiggins H, Roscoe E . Evaluation of an indirect assessment for identifying tasks for functional analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 2019; 53(2):997-1012. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.656. View

4.
Piazza C, Fisher W, Hagopian L, Bowman L, Toole L . Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(1):1-9. PMC: 1279869. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1. View

5.
Smith R . Analysis of establishing operations for self-injury maintained by escape. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995; 28(4):515-35. PMC: 1279857. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-515. View