» Articles » PMID: 39940732

Comprehensive Evaluation of Multi-Omics Clustering Algorithms for Cancer Molecular Subtyping

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Feb 13
PMID 39940732
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As a highly heterogeneous and complex disease, the identification of cancer's molecular subtypes is crucial for accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment. The integration of multi-omics data enables a comprehensive interpretation of the molecular characteristics of cancer at various biological levels. In recent years, an increasing number of multi-omics clustering algorithms for cancer molecular subtyping have been proposed. However, the absence of a definitive gold standard makes it challenging to evaluate and compare these methods effectively. In this study, we developed a general framework for the comprehensive evaluation of multi-omics clustering algorithms and introduced an innovative metric, the accuracy-weighted average index, which simultaneously considers both clustering performance and clinical relevance. Using this framework, we performed a thorough evaluation and comparison of 11 state-of-the-art multi-omics clustering algorithms, including deep learning-based methods. By integrating the accuracy-weighted average index with computational efficiency, our analysis reveals that PIntMF demonstrates the best overall performance, making it a promising tool for molecular subtyping across a wide range of cancers.

References
1.
Chauvel C, Novoloaca A, Veyre P, Reynier F, Becker J . Evaluation of integrative clustering methods for the analysis of multi-omics data. Brief Bioinform. 2019; 21(2):541-552. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz015. View

2.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa R, Ko J, Swetter S, Blau H . Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017; 542(7639):115-118. PMC: 8382232. DOI: 10.1038/nature21056. View

3.
Song W, Wang W, Dai D . Subtype-WESLR: identifying cancer subtype with weighted ensemble sparse latent representation of multi-view data. Brief Bioinform. 2021; 23(1). DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab398. View

4.
Wang B, Mezlini A, Demir F, Fiume M, Tu Z, Brudno M . Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(3):333-7. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2810. View

5.
Olsen T, Jackson B, Feeser T, Kent M, Moad J, Krishnamurthy S . Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms Applied to Three Common Diagnoses in Dermatopathology. J Pathol Inform. 2018; 9:32. PMC: 6166480. DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_31_18. View