Defining Competence Profiles in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using the Modified Requirement Tracking Questionnaire

Overview

Journal BMC Med Educ

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2025 Feb 7

PMID 39920687

Authors

Baptiste Tarasi

Viktor Oubaid

David Baud

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Data about the competencies needed for physicians in obstetrics and gynecology (O&G) is currently insufficient. The aim of this study is to define the competence profile needed in this sector for daily professional activity, in order to account for these criteria in future recruitment.

Methods: The modified requirement-tracking questionnaire (R-track) was sent to 307 physicians working in the field of O&G with different training levels and practice locations. The R-track is designed to assess professional competence profiles and contains 66 items covering the following eight competence areas: "Mental abilities", "Social sensibility", "Psychomotor and multitasking abilities", "Solutions orientation", "Social interactive competences", "Personality traits", "Verbal competences" and "Resistance capacity". The mean scores of single items and competence areas were calculated. Results were compared between gender, training level, and place of practice.

Results: The participation rate was 65.5%, with 201 physicians returning the questionnaire. In this sample, 50.2% of them were in training and 49.8% were practicing O&G specialists. The proportion of physicians working in a hospital setting was 64.7% while 30.3% worked in private practice. The competence areas "Social sensibility" and "Psychomotor & multitasking abilities" appear to be the most important for daily professional activity. At the item level, "Stress resistance", followed by "Workload management" and "Tactfulness" were considered as the most valuable characteristics. Differences between gender, level of training, and place of practice were not significant.

Conclusion: The identified competence profile could serve as a basis for developing a new method of O&G residency selection. In addition, such a profile could help medical students to decide on a professional specialization at a very early stage by comparing their personal competence profile with the one in the field or with their mentors.

References

Smith R . Burnout in Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 62(3):405-412. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000441. View

Patel H, Yakkanti R, Bellam K, Agyeman K, Aiyer A . Innovation in Resident Selection: Life Without Step 1. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022; 9:23821205221084936. PMC: 8968982. DOI: 10.1177/23821205221084936. View

Huang W, Hsu S, Yang C, Lin C, Suk F, Hu K . A novel approach: Simulating multiple simultaneous encounters to assess multitasking ability in emergency medicine. PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0257887. PMC: 8478191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257887. View

Mullola S, Hakulinen C, Presseau J, de Porras D, Jokela M, Hintsa T . Personality traits and career choices among physicians in Finland: employment sector, clinical patient contact, specialty and change of specialty. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):52. PMC: 5870817. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1155-9. View

Zelesniack E, Oubaid V, Harendza S . Final-year medical students' competence profiles according to the modified requirement tracking questionnaire. BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21(1):319. PMC: 8178874. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02728-2. View

Stohl H, Hueppchen N, Bienstock J . Can medical school performance predict residency performance? Resident selection and predictors of successful performance in obstetrics and gynecology. J Grad Med Educ. 2011; 2(3):322-6. PMC: 2951767. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-09-00101.1. View

Cullen M, Zhang C, Marcus-Blank B, Braman J, Tiryaki E, Konia M . Improving Our Ability to Predict Resident Applicant Performance: Validity Evidence for a Situational Judgment Test. Teach Learn Med. 2020; 32(5):508-521. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1760104. View

Mielke I, Breil S, Amelung D, Espe L, Knorr M . Assessing distinguishable social skills in medical admission: does construct-driven development solve validity issues of situational judgment tests?. BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):293. PMC: 9020047. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03305-x. View

Bell J, Kanellitsas I, Shaffer L . Selection of obstetrics and gynecology residents on the basis of medical school performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(5):1091-4. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.121622. View

10.

Vaughan L, Quick J . Evidence-Based Selection of Surgical Residents. Surg Clin North Am. 2021; 101(4):667-677. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2021.05.012. View

11.

Kenny S, McInnes M, Singh V . Associations between residency selection strategies and doctor performance: a meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2013; 47(8):790-800. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12234. View

12.

Tidwell J, Yudien M, Rutledge H, Terhune K, LaFemina J, Aarons C . Reshaping Residency Recruitment: Achieving Alignment Between Applicants and Programs in Surgery. J Surg Educ. 2022; 79(3):643-654. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.01.004. View

13.

Ghaith S, Campbell R, Pollock J, Torbenson V, Lindor R . Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology in the USA. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7). PMC: 9319230. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071328. View

14.

Jebram L, Prediger S, Oubaid V, Harendza S . Matching of advanced undergraduate medical students' competence profiles with the required competence profiles of their specialty of choice for postgraduate training. BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):647. PMC: 10485971. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04632-3. View

15.

Rotenstein L, Torre M, Ramos M, Rosales R, Guille C, Sen S . Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2018; 320(11):1131-1150. PMC: 6233645. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.12777. View

16.

Naides A, Ayyala H, Lee E . How Do We Choose? A Review of Residency Application Scoring Systems. J Surg Educ. 2021; 78(5):1461-1468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.02.003. View

17.

Smith R, Rayburn W . Burnout in Obstetricians-Gynecologists: Its Prevalence, Identification, Prevention, and Reversal. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021; 48(1):231-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.008. View

18.

Bexelius T, Olsson C, Jarnbert-Pettersson H, Parmskog M, Ponzer S, Dahlin M . Association between personality traits and future choice of specialisation among Swedish doctors: a cross-sectional study. Postgrad Med J. 2016; 92(1090):441-6. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133478. View

19.

Pontiggia A, Gomez-Merino D, Quiquempoix M, Beauchamps V, Boffet A, Fabries P . MATB for assessing different mental workload levels. Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1408242. PMC: 11300324. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1408242. View

20.

Furstenberg S, Schick K, Deppermann J, Prediger S, Berberat P, Kadmon M . Competencies for first year residents - physicians' views from medical schools with different undergraduate curricula. BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17(1):154. PMC: 5590189. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0998-9. View