» Articles » PMID: 35372695

Innovation in Resident Selection: Life Without Step 1

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2022 Apr 4
PMID 35372695
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The announcement of Step 1 shifting to a Pass/Fail metric has prompted resident selection committees (RSCs) to pursue objective methods of evaluating prospective residents. Regardless of the program's specialty or affiliated hospital/school, RSCs universally aim to recognize and choose applicants who are an "optimal fit" to their programs. An optimal fit can be defined as a candidate who thrives in the clinical and academic setting, both contributing to and benefiting from their respective training environments.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to evaluate alternative, innovative methods by which RSCs can evaluate applicants and predict success during residency. Objective methods include: Step 2 scores, Traditionally Used Metrics (core clerkship scores), interview performance, musical talent, sports involvement, AOA membership, research publications, unprofessional behavior, Dean's letters, Rank list, judgement testing, and specialty-specific shelf exams..

Methods: A scoping review was performed in compliance with the guidelines indicated by the PRISMA Protocol for scoping review. 9308 results were identified in the original PubMed search for articles with the key words "Resident Success". Abstract screening and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded 97 articles that were critically appraised via review of full manuscript.

Results: Of the articles that focused on personality traits, situational judgement testing, and specialty specific pre-assessment, all of them demonstrated some level of predictability for resident success. Standardized Letter of Recommendations, Traditionally Used Metrics, and STEP 2 did not show a unanimous consensus in demonstrating predictability of a resident's success, this is because some articles suggested predictability and some articles disputed predictability.

Conclusion: The authors found personality traits, situational judgement testing, and specialty specific assessments to be predictive in selecting successful residents. Further research should aim to analyze exactly how RSCs utilize these assessment tools to aid in screening their large and competitive applicant pools to find residents that will be successful in their program.

Citing Articles

Impact of a USMLE Step 2 Prediction Model on Medical Student Motivations.

Shanks A, Steckler B, Smith S, Rusk D, Walvoord E, Dafoe E J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025; 12:23821205251321812.

PMID: 39974318 PMC: 11837067. DOI: 10.1177/23821205251321812.


Defining competence profiles in obstetrics and gynecology using the modified requirement tracking questionnaire.

Tarasi B, Oubaid V, Baud D BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):204.

PMID: 39920687 PMC: 11806616. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06806-7.


A Eulogy for the Match.

Warm E, Weber D, Kinnear B J Grad Med Educ. 2023; 15(3):303-305.

PMID: 37363663 PMC: 10286912. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00167.1.


Evaluating the Whole Applicant: Use of Situational Judgment Testing and Personality Testing to Address Disparities in Resident Selection.

Takacs E, Tracy C Curr Urol Rep. 2022; 23(11):309-318.

PMID: 36255650 PMC: 9579621. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01115-8.

References
1.
Bloodgood R, Short J, Jackson J, Martindale J . A change to pass/fail grading in the first two years at one medical school results in improved psychological well-being. Acad Med. 2009; 84(5):655-62. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819f6d78. View

2.
Burkhardt J, Parekh K, Gallahue F, London K, Edens M, Humbert A . A Critical Disconnect: Residency Selection Factors Lack Correlation With Intern Performance. J Grad Med Educ. 2021; 12(6):696-704. PMC: 7771600. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00013.1. View

3.
Brandenburg S, Kruzick T, Lin C, Robinson A, Adams L . Residency Selection Criteria: What Medical Students Perceive as Important. Med Educ Online. 2017; 10(1):4383. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v10i.4383. View

4.
Dyrstad B, Pope D, Milbrandt J, Beck R, Weinhoeft A, Idusuyi O . Predictive measures of a resident's performance on written Orthopaedic Board scores. Iowa Orthop J. 2011; 31:238-43. PMC: 3215143. View

5.
Raman T, Alrabaa R, Sood A, Maloof P, Benevenia J, Berberian W . Does Residency Selection Criteria Predict Performance in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 474(4):908-14. PMC: 4773357. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4317-7. View