» Articles » PMID: 35440029

Assessing Distinguishable Social Skills in Medical Admission: Does Construct-driven Development Solve Validity Issues of Situational Judgment Tests?

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2022 Apr 20
PMID 35440029
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Social skills are important for future physicians and are therefore increasingly considered in selection processes. One economic assessment method from which different social skills can be inferred are Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) in which applicants are asked to rate behavioral responses in context-relevant situations. However, traditional SJTs have so far failed to distinctively measure specified constructs. To address this shortcoming in the medical admission context, we applied a construct-driven approach of SJT development in which test development was deductively guided by agency and communion as target constructs.

Method: The final version of the construct-driven SJT includes 15 items per construct with three behavioral responses. Medical school applicants (N = 1527) completed the construct-driven SJT, a traditional SJT, and an aptitude test under high-stakes condition as part of their application. A subsample (N = 575) participated in a subsequent voluntary online study with self-report measures of personality and past behavior.

Results: The proposed two-factor structure and internal consistency of the construct-driven SJT was confirmed. Communal SJT scores were positively associated with self-reported communal personality and communal behavior, yet effects were smaller than expected. Findings for agentic SJT scores were mixed with positive small associations to self-reported agentic personality scores and agentic behavior but unexpected negative relations to communal self-reported measures.

Conclusions: Results suggest that construct-driven SJTs might overcome validity limitations of traditional SJTs, although their implementation is challenging. Despite first indicators of validity, future research needs to address practical points of application in high-stakes settings, inclusion of other constructs, and especially prediction of actual behavior before the application of construct-driven SJTs for selection purposes in medical admission can be recommended.

Citing Articles

Defining competence profiles in obstetrics and gynecology using the modified requirement tracking questionnaire.

Tarasi B, Oubaid V, Baud D BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):204.

PMID: 39920687 PMC: 11806616. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06806-7.


Physicians' Social Skills - Conceptualization, Taxonomy, and Behavioral Assessment.

Breil S, Amelung D, Oberst S, Rollinger T, Ahrens H, Garbe A Perspect Med Educ. 2024; 13(1):635-645.

PMID: 39735823 PMC: 11673732. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1171.


Measuring personal characteristics in applicants to German medical schools: Piloting an online Situational Judgement Test with an open-ended response format.

Knorr M, Mielke I, Amelung D, Safari M, Grone O, Breil S GMS J Med Educ. 2024; 41(3):Doc30.

PMID: 39131892 PMC: 11310783. DOI: 10.3205/zma001685.


The effects of language proficiency and awareness of time limit in animated vs. text-based situational judgment tests.

Rabe M, Grone O, von Bernstorff C, Knorr M BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):540.

PMID: 38750433 PMC: 11097494. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05513-z.


Predicting Actual Social Skill Expression from Personality and Skill Self-Concepts.

Breil S, Mielke I, Ahrens H, Geldmacher T, Sensmeier J, Marschall B J Intell. 2022; 10(3).

PMID: 35997404 PMC: 9397015. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence10030048.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Hissbach J, Klusmann D, Hampe W . Dimensionality and predictive validity of the HAM-Nat, a test of natural sciences for medical school admission. BMC Med Educ. 2011; 11:83. PMC: 3261109. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-83. View

3.
Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J . How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2015; 50(1):36-60. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12817. View

4.
Hissbach J, Klusmann D, Hampe W . Reliability of a science admission test (HAM-Nat) at Hamburg medical school. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2011; 28(3):Doc44. PMC: 3159206. DOI: 10.3205/zma000756. View

5.
Schwibbe A, Lackamp J, Knorr M, Hissbach J, Kadmon M, Hampe W . [Selection of medical students : Measurement of cognitive abilities and psychosocial competencies]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018; 61(2):178-186. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2670-2. View